The Association between Sampling and Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Adequate sampling is essential to an accurate pathologic evaluation of pancreatectomy specimens resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, limited data are available for the association between the sampling and survival in these patients. We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as their correlations with clinicopathologic features, for 627 patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ESOP was also associated with a smaller tumor size (<i>p</i> < 0.001), more lymph nodes (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a lower ypN stage (<i>p</i> < 0.001), better differentiation (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (<i>p</i> = 0.009). However, since ESOP and ESOT were primarily conducted for cases with no grossly identifiable tumor or minimal residual carcinoma in initial sections, potential bias cannot be excluded. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis and better DFS and OS (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, accurate pathologic evaluation using ESOP and ESOT is associated with the prognosis in PDAC patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response and ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193312
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association between Sampling and Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Matthew H. G. Katz, Dan Zhao, Eugene J. Koay, Robert A. Wolff et al.
1 citations
Cancers
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
0.28
article

The Association between Sampling and Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Matthew H. G. Katz, Dan Zhao, Eugene J. Koay, Robert A. Wolff, Michael P. Kim, Anirban Maitra, Dongguang Wei, Yi Tat Tong, Deyali Chatterjee, Mehran Taherian, Ching‐Wei D. Tzeng, Naruhiko Ikoma, Hua Wang, Zongshan Lai, Laura R. Prakash
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adequate sampling is essential to an accurate pathologic evaluation of pancreatectomy specimens resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, limited data are available for the association between the sampling and survival in these patients. We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as their correlations with clinicopathologic features, for 627 patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ESOP was also associated with a smaller tumor size (<i>p</i> < 0.001), more lymph nodes (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a lower ypN stage (<i>p</i> < 0.001), better differentiation (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (<i>p</i> = 0.009). However, since ESOP and ESOT were primarily conducted for cases with no grossly identifiable tumor or minimal residual carcinoma in initial sections, potential bias cannot be excluded. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis and better DFS and OS (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response (<i>p</i> < 0.05). ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, accurate pathologic evaluation using ESOP and ESOT is associated with the prognosis in PDAC patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response and ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT.

CancersVol. 16(19)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.