Clinical strategy study on prenatal screening and diagnostic model for Down syndrome

Exploring efficient and easily implementable prenatal screening strategies aims at birth defect prevention and control. However, there have been limited economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) strategies in China. Furthermore, these studies were predominantly confined to local or geographically proximate provinces and lacked universality and representativeness. This study assesses the health economics of current prenatal screening strategies and NIPS as first-line screening programs, analyzing their efficacy to determine an optimal strategy. From the perspective of health economics, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and single-factor sensitivity were conducted for five different screening strategies using a decision tree model. Among pregnant women aged < 35 years who underwent only one screening for foetal Down syndrome (DS), the detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value of NIPS for foetuses with DS were superior to those of the other four serological screening methods. Although applying NIPS as first-line screening method yields the highest efficacy and benefits, it currently lacks cost-effectiveness when compared to serological screening and sequential NIPS screening strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73183-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical strategy study on prenatal screening and diagnostic model for Down syndrome

Shanling Liu, Fene Zou, Hongqian Liu, Lingling Xing et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
article

Clinical strategy study on prenatal screening and diagnostic model for Down syndrome

Shanling Liu, Fene Zou, Hongqian Liu, Lingling Xing, Daiwen Han, Kai Zhao, Quanfang Zhou, Bin He, Lixing Yuan, Ting Bai, Ling Pang, Tianyu Xia, Cechuan Deng, Xiangjin Wei, Wei Luo, Sha Liu, Qian Zhu, Jianlong Liu, Jing Cheng, Yunyun Liu, Jun Tang, Yuan Luo, Xiaosha Jing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Exploring efficient and easily implementable prenatal screening strategies aims at birth defect prevention and control. However, there have been limited economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) strategies in China. Furthermore, these studies were predominantly confined to local or geographically proximate provinces and lacked universality and representativeness. This study assesses the health economics of current prenatal screening strategies and NIPS as first-line screening programs, analyzing their efficacy to determine an optimal strategy. From the perspective of health economics, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and single-factor sensitivity were conducted for five different screening strategies using a decision tree model. Among pregnant women aged < 35 years who underwent only one screening for foetal Down syndrome (DS), the detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value of NIPS for foetuses with DS were superior to those of the other four serological screening methods. Although applying NIPS as first-line screening method yields the highest efficacy and benefits, it currently lacks cost-effectiveness when compared to serological screening and sequential NIPS screening strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.