Diagnosis of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection: serology vs. urea breath test
This study compares the performance of serology with urea breath test in the diagnosis of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> in a population-level data set and mimics a head-to-head direct comparison as the study population had both tests performed within 2 weeks of each other. This provides new information supporting the use of serology in a diagnostic algorithm. There are several instances where serology could be preferable to patients to rule out disease, despite some guidelines suggesting serology should not be used.
Authors
- Yin Xia Chang
- Muhammad Golam Morshed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-9320)
- Christopher D. Fjell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6304-2628)
- Mel Krajden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-8748)
- Miguel Imperial (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-7940)
- Michael T. Kelly
- Kennard Tan
Institutions
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Fraser Health (CA)
- BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01084-24
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.29