Medicaid's Political Development since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded

The Medicaid program has changed enormously over the past 60 years from a very restrictive program primarily attached to recipients on public assistance in 1965 to a much more expansive program today allowing coverage for persons regardless of marital, parental, or employment status. Incorporating the "medically needy"-an ambiguous concept from the start-allowed states to include many different groups in Medicaid who are not traditionally thought of as poor. In addition, three structural features illuminate why the program has expanded and changed dramatically over time: federalism and intergovernmental financing, the dominance of the private sector, and fragmentation. Unequal treatment among Medicaid-covered groups alongside partisan politics create a political discourse that often reveals Medicaid as a public subsidy for stigmatized groups while hiding Medicaid's reach into the middle class. This central political ideological tension collides with programmatic realities such that Medicaid strangely often suffers from a residual retrenchment politics while at the same time benefiting from embeddedness, making it extremely difficult to truly turn back the clock on Medicaid's expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11567692
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicaid's Political Development since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded

Colleen M. Grogan
5 citations
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Healthcare Policy and Management
5.65
article

Medicaid's Political Development since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded

Colleen M. Grogan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The Medicaid program has changed enormously over the past 60 years from a very restrictive program primarily attached to recipients on public assistance in 1965 to a much more expansive program today allowing coverage for persons regardless of marital, parental, or employment status. Incorporating the "medically needy"-an ambiguous concept from the start-allowed states to include many different groups in Medicaid who are not traditionally thought of as poor. In addition, three structural features illuminate why the program has expanded and changed dramatically over time: federalism and intergovernmental financing, the dominance of the private sector, and fragmentation. Unequal treatment among Medicaid-covered groups alongside partisan politics create a political discourse that often reveals Medicaid as a public subsidy for stigmatized groups while hiding Medicaid's reach into the middle class. This central political ideological tension collides with programmatic realities such that Medicaid strangely often suffers from a residual retrenchment politics while at the same time benefiting from embeddedness, making it extremely difficult to truly turn back the clock on Medicaid's expansion.

Journal of Health Politics Policy and LawVol. 50(2)
University of Chicago (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Policy and Management
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Medicaid's Political Development since 1965: How a Fragmented and Unequal Program Has Expanded — Colleen M. Grogan · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS