The refinement paradox and cumulative cultural evolution: Complex products of collective improvement favor conformist outcomes, blind copying, and hyper-credulity

Social learning is common in nature, yet cumulative culture (where knowledge and technology increase in complexity and diversity over time) appears restricted to humans. To understand why, we organized a computer tournament in which programmed entries specified when to learn new knowledge and when to refine (i.e. improve) existing knowledge. The tournament revealed a 'refinement paradox': refined behavior afforded higher payoffs as individuals converged on a small number of successful behavioral variants, but refining did not generally pay. Paradoxically, entries that refined only in certain conditions did best during behavioral improvement, while simple copying entries thrived when refinement levels were high. Cumulative cultural evolution may be rare in part because sophisticated strategies for improving knowledge and technology are initially advantageous, yet complex culture, once achieved, favors conformity, blind imitation and hyper-credulity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012436
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The refinement paradox and cumulative cultural evolution: Complex products of collective improvement favor conformist outcomes, blind copying, and hyper-credulity

Kevin N. Laland, Daniel Cownden, Stuart Murray, Elena Miu et al.
5 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Language and cultural evolution
21.45
article

The refinement paradox and cumulative cultural evolution: Complex products of collective improvement favor conformist outcomes, blind copying, and hyper-credulity

Kevin N. Laland, Daniel Cownden, Stuart Murray, Elena Miu, Luke Rendell, Richard McElreath, Timothy Lillicrap, Kimmo Eriksson, Marcus W. Feldman, Magnus Enquist, James Ounsley, Sam Bowles, Rob Boyd
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Social learning is common in nature, yet cumulative culture (where knowledge and technology increase in complexity and diversity over time) appears restricted to humans. To understand why, we organized a computer tournament in which programmed entries specified when to learn new knowledge and when to refine (i.e. improve) existing knowledge. The tournament revealed a 'refinement paradox': refined behavior afforded higher payoffs as individuals converged on a small number of successful behavioral variants, but refining did not generally pay. Paradoxically, entries that refined only in certain conditions did best during behavioral improvement, while simple copying entries thrived when refinement levels were high. Cumulative cultural evolution may be rare in part because sophisticated strategies for improving knowledge and technology are initially advantageous, yet complex culture, once achieved, favors conformity, blind imitation and hyper-credulity.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 20(9)
Marine Scotland (GB), Santa Fe Institute (US), Stockholm University (SE), University of St Andrews (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Capital Regional District (CA), Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB), Google (United Kingdom) (GB), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Arizona State University (US), Stanford University (US)
European Research Council, Fogarty International Center
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language and cultural evolution
21.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.