The historical evolution and research trends of life cycle assessment

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool for environmental decision-making; however, it still has theoretical and practical limitations. Through a comprehensive review of traditional LCA development and case studies, this study examines the overall trajectory of the evolution of the LCA methodological framework. It specifically addresses perspectives on typical LCA methods, dynamic LCA methods, expanding LCA into multidimensional assessment, simplifying the methodological framework, and integrating with other methods. Furthermore, it delves into improvements and optimizations of the methodological framework alongside their distinct characteristics. Drawing on insights from current analyses and the evolutionary path of the LCA methodological framework, this study outlines future research directions for LCA. It aims to serve as a reference for scholars in this field, thereby fostering further methodological enhancements and broadening the scope of LCA applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Carbon
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greenca.2024.08.003
Citations
53
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The historical evolution and research trends of life cycle assessment

Min Liu, Yajun Tian, Guangyan Zhu
53 citations
Green Carbon
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
10.90
article

The historical evolution and research trends of life cycle assessment

Min Liu, Yajun Tian, Guangyan Zhu
article en
53 citations

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a widely used tool for environmental decision-making; however, it still has theoretical and practical limitations. Through a comprehensive review of traditional LCA development and case studies, this study examines the overall trajectory of the evolution of the LCA methodological framework. It specifically addresses perspectives on typical LCA methods, dynamic LCA methods, expanding LCA into multidimensional assessment, simplifying the methodological framework, and integrating with other methods. Furthermore, it delves into improvements and optimizations of the methodological framework alongside their distinct characteristics. Drawing on insights from current analyses and the evolutionary path of the LCA methodological framework, this study outlines future research directions for LCA. It aims to serve as a reference for scholars in this field, thereby fostering further methodological enhancements and broadening the scope of LCA applications.

Green CarbonVol. 2(4)
Qinghai New Energy (China) (CN), Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology (CN), Qingdao Center of Resource Chemistry and New Materials (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
10.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.