Review of non-domestic building stock modelling studies under socio-technical system framework

The construction industry contributes to approximately 30% of global energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, necessitating urgent measures to mitigate carbon emissions and address climate problems. This study focuses on the underexplored realm of Non-domestic Building Stock (NDBS), which constitutes 8% of global energy consumption and 11% of worldwide carbon emissions. Due to the long lifecycle of buildings, a comprehensive assessment of the NDBS is imperative to achieve the goal of net-zero carbon buildings by 2050. The current NDBS studies can be categorised into two groups based on the geographic location and type of building being studied. Each of these two different building stocks demonstrates different research and analysis tools, but specific comparisons have not yet been made between them. In addition, existing literature reviews of NDBS have mainly emphasised the technical aspects and neglected their social aspects. This study aims to critically review the energy and carbon footprint related efforts in NDBS research, assess the current state of research, and propose potential research trends. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 99 out of 906 articles are fully reviewed. Utilising and adapting the Social-Technical Systems (STS) approach, this study analyses the data requirements, research methods, and research objectives of NDBS studies concerning energy consumption and carbon footprint from five perspectives, namely infrastructure, technology, processes, goals, and people. Results demonstrate that geo-stock and type-stock approaches, while focusing on different aspects of building stock, can share data and analysis methods to improve research efficiency and model accuracy. Additionally, findings highlight that incorporating socio-economic factors into technical models can enhance model robustness and output reliability, thereby supporting effective policy-making and energy management strategies. This study provides a new multidimensional approach to evaluate the development of NDBS energy and carbon footprint research, and helps to incorporate socio-economic analysis into NDBS physics-based models to improve the efficiency and reliability of such models for future research and practice. • Adapt socio-technical framework to analyse non-domestic building stock. • Compare type-stock and geo-stock within NDBS to identify challenges and strategies. • Integrate societal aspects into NDBS studies for policy relevance and effectiveness. • Improve NDBS modelling techniques for accurate and reliable policy-making decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110873
Citations
11
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of non-domestic building stock modelling studies under socio-technical system framework

Zigeng Fang, Paul Ruyssevelt, Ivan Korolija, Pamela Fennell et al.
11 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
BIM and Construction Integration
2.92
article

Review of non-domestic building stock modelling studies under socio-technical system framework

Zigeng Fang, Paul Ruyssevelt, Ivan Korolija, Pamela Fennell, Rui Tang, Jingfeng Zhou
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The construction industry contributes to approximately 30% of global energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, necessitating urgent measures to mitigate carbon emissions and address climate problems. This study focuses on the underexplored realm of Non-domestic Building Stock (NDBS), which constitutes 8% of global energy consumption and 11% of worldwide carbon emissions. Due to the long lifecycle of buildings, a comprehensive assessment of the NDBS is imperative to achieve the goal of net-zero carbon buildings by 2050. The current NDBS studies can be categorised into two groups based on the geographic location and type of building being studied. Each of these two different building stocks demonstrates different research and analysis tools, but specific comparisons have not yet been made between them. In addition, existing literature reviews of NDBS have mainly emphasised the technical aspects and neglected their social aspects. This study aims to critically review the energy and carbon footprint related efforts in NDBS research, assess the current state of research, and propose potential research trends. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 99 out of 906 articles are fully reviewed. Utilising and adapting the Social-Technical Systems (STS) approach, this study analyses the data requirements, research methods, and research objectives of NDBS studies concerning energy consumption and carbon footprint from five perspectives, namely infrastructure, technology, processes, goals, and people. Results demonstrate that geo-stock and type-stock approaches, while focusing on different aspects of building stock, can share data and analysis methods to improve research efficiency and model accuracy. Additionally, findings highlight that incorporating socio-economic factors into technical models can enhance model robustness and output reliability, thereby supporting effective policy-making and energy management strategies. This study provides a new multidimensional approach to evaluate the development of NDBS energy and carbon footprint research, and helps to incorporate socio-economic analysis into NDBS physics-based models to improve the efficiency and reliability of such models for future research and practice. • Adapt socio-technical framework to analyse non-domestic building stock. • Compare type-stock and geo-stock within NDBS to identify challenges and strategies. • Integrate societal aspects into NDBS studies for policy relevance and effectiveness. • Improve NDBS modelling techniques for accurate and reliable policy-making decisions.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 97
Energy Institute (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University College London (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
BIM and Construction Integration
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.