Criminalising Stealthing: Lessons From the UK and Australia

The boundaries of sexual offences and the many facets of consent have provided somewhat of a legal conundrum, especially in the 21st century. Correctly identifying and labelling the various offences, alongside discussions around consent and deception, has had particular significance. The focal research question this article will consider is the concept of stealthing – a term used to describe non-consensual condom removal during sexual intercourse, how the criminal law should deal with such behaviour and the legal ramifications of this. We examine the utility of the current statutory frameworks and suggest avenues that extend beyond the criminalisation of this behaviour, focussing on both the UK and Australian territories in comparative analysis. An ideal and novel legal approach to addressing this non-consensual form of sexual behaviour is suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Criminal Law
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183241274917
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminalising Stealthing: Lessons From the UK and Australia

Brianna Chesser, Amanda Clough-Ricci
3 citations
The Journal of Criminal Law
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
2.34
article

Criminalising Stealthing: Lessons From the UK and Australia

Brianna Chesser, Amanda Clough-Ricci
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The boundaries of sexual offences and the many facets of consent have provided somewhat of a legal conundrum, especially in the 21st century. Correctly identifying and labelling the various offences, alongside discussions around consent and deception, has had particular significance. The focal research question this article will consider is the concept of stealthing – a term used to describe non-consensual condom removal during sexual intercourse, how the criminal law should deal with such behaviour and the legal ramifications of this. We examine the utility of the current statutory frameworks and suggest avenues that extend beyond the criminalisation of this behaviour, focussing on both the UK and Australian territories in comparative analysis. An ideal and novel legal approach to addressing this non-consensual form of sexual behaviour is suggested.

The Journal of Criminal LawVol. 88(5-6)
Northumbria University (GB), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.