Shared fate was associated with sustained cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Did the COVID-19 pandemic bring people together or push them apart? While infectious diseases tend to push people apart, crises can also bring people together through positive interdependence. We studied this question by asking an international sample (N = 1,006) about their inclinations to cooperate, perceptions of interdependence (i.e., shared fate), and perceived risk as well as local prevalence of COVID-19 infection across 14 time points from March to August, 2020. While perceived interdependence with others tended to increase during this time period, inclinations to cooperate decreased over time. At the within-person level, higher local prevalence of COVID-19 attenuated increases in perceived interdependence with others, and was associated with lower inclinations to cooperate. At the between-person level, people with high perceived interdependence with others reported more stable, or increasing, inclinations to cooperate over time than people with low perceived interdependence. Establishing a high sense of perceived interdependence with others may thus allow people to maintain cooperation during crises, even in the face of challenging circumstances such as those posed by a highly transmissible virus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307829
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared fate was associated with sustained cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Athena Aktipis, Joe Alcock, Diego Guevara Beltrán, Geoffrey T Miller et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
article

Shared fate was associated with sustained cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Athena Aktipis, Joe Alcock, Diego Guevara Beltrán, Geoffrey T Miller, Andrew Van Horn, Keith G. Tidball, Scott Claessens, Lee Cronk, Pamela Winfrey, Emily Zarka, Nicole Hudson, Hector Hurmuz-Sklias, Peter M. Todd, Jessica D. Ayers, Cristina Baciu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Did the COVID-19 pandemic bring people together or push them apart? While infectious diseases tend to push people apart, crises can also bring people together through positive interdependence. We studied this question by asking an international sample (N = 1,006) about their inclinations to cooperate, perceptions of interdependence (i.e., shared fate), and perceived risk as well as local prevalence of COVID-19 infection across 14 time points from March to August, 2020. While perceived interdependence with others tended to increase during this time period, inclinations to cooperate decreased over time. At the within-person level, higher local prevalence of COVID-19 attenuated increases in perceived interdependence with others, and was associated with lower inclinations to cooperate. At the between-person level, people with high perceived interdependence with others reported more stable, or increasing, inclinations to cooperate over time than people with low perceived interdependence. Establishing a high sense of perceived interdependence with others may thus allow people to maintain cooperation during crises, even in the face of challenging circumstances such as those posed by a highly transmissible virus.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(9)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boise State University (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Auckland (NZ), University of New Mexico (US), Cornell University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Tempe Union High School District (US), Arizona State University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Arizona State University, University of Arizona, Charles Koch Foundation, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.