Comparison of the Statistical and Autoencoder Approach for Anomaly Detection in Big Data

This paper compares two anomaly detection methods, comparing the Z-score statistical technique with autoen-coders for big datasets, which are crucial for industries like manufacturing, energy, and transportation to maintain smooth operations and avoid costly disruptions. Autoencoders outperformed Z-score statistical technique in anomaly detection on big datasets, achieving higher precision (0.94), F1-score (0.97), and recall (1.00) compared to Z-score statistical technique. This highlights autoencoders' superior ability to accurately identify anomalies, making them more effective for robust anomaly detection in complex data environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ibdap62940.2024.10689688
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Statistical and Autoencoder Approach for Anomaly Detection in Big Data

Barasha Mali
2 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.69
article

Comparison of the Statistical and Autoencoder Approach for Anomaly Detection in Big Data

Barasha Mali
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper compares two anomaly detection methods, comparing the Z-score statistical technique with autoen-coders for big datasets, which are crucial for industries like manufacturing, energy, and transportation to maintain smooth operations and avoid costly disruptions. Autoencoders outperformed Z-score statistical technique in anomaly detection on big datasets, achieving higher precision (0.94), F1-score (0.97), and recall (1.00) compared to Z-score statistical technique. This highlights autoencoders' superior ability to accurately identify anomalies, making them more effective for robust anomaly detection in complex data environments.

Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.