Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100

The Vision Screener V100, while generally aligning well with PlusoptiX A16, tends to underestimate myopic spherical equivalent, overestimate hyperopic cases, and underestimate J0 astigmatism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ophthalmology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1414417
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100

Jorge Jorge, Paulo Fernandes
2 citations
Frontiers in Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
article

Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100

Jorge Jorge, Paulo Fernandes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Vision Screener V100, while generally aligning well with PlusoptiX A16, tends to underestimate myopic spherical equivalent, overestimate hyperopic cases, and underestimate J0 astigmatism.

Frontiers in OphthalmologyVol. 4
University of Minho (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100 — Jorge Jorge, Paulo Fernandes · Frontiers in Ophthalmology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS