Internal forces measured in segmental tunnel linings compared with numerical predictions obtained from state-of-the-art calculation methods used in engineering practice

• Analytical methods and numerical models can determine accurately inner forces in segmental lining. • A comparison is useful between calculation results and in situ monitoring. • Assembly imperfections influence the development of bending moments in segmental linings. • Some common modeling approaches might underestimate the stresses in tunnel linings. • The whole possible parameter bandwidth should be investigated in structural design. Different calculation methods and modeling strategies are commonly used in engineering practice to predict the internal forces in segmental tunnel linings. Accordingly, the calculation results can differ. The present paper compares internal forces resulting from five state-of-the-art calculation models, of which three continuum models and two bedded beam models, to new in-situ measurements of internal forces at the recently built TBM tunnel for the U5 metro line in Frankfurt, Germany, and discusses agreements and differences. Hereby, a generally good agreement is found for the normal forces. The predictions of the bending moments are satisfying, but there are some discrepancies. It is shown that it might be necessary to consider assembly imperfections in the calculation models to improve the agreement between the calculation results and the measurements. Also, the differences between the calculation methods themselves are addressed. It is analyzed that generally continuum models give more realistic internal forces, but that also bedded beam models can have advantages, e.g. when large parametric studies are required. Finally, recommendations are given regarding the application of calculation models for structural design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.106084
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal forces measured in segmental tunnel linings compared with numerical predictions obtained from state-of-the-art calculation methods used in engineering practice

Fabian Rauch, Pierpaolo Oreste, Oliver Fischer
7 citations
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
2.55
article

Internal forces measured in segmental tunnel linings compared with numerical predictions obtained from state-of-the-art calculation methods used in engineering practice

Fabian Rauch, Pierpaolo Oreste, Oliver Fischer
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Analytical methods and numerical models can determine accurately inner forces in segmental lining. • A comparison is useful between calculation results and in situ monitoring. • Assembly imperfections influence the development of bending moments in segmental linings. • Some common modeling approaches might underestimate the stresses in tunnel linings. • The whole possible parameter bandwidth should be investigated in structural design. Different calculation methods and modeling strategies are commonly used in engineering practice to predict the internal forces in segmental tunnel linings. Accordingly, the calculation results can differ. The present paper compares internal forces resulting from five state-of-the-art calculation models, of which three continuum models and two bedded beam models, to new in-situ measurements of internal forces at the recently built TBM tunnel for the U5 metro line in Frankfurt, Germany, and discusses agreements and differences. Hereby, a generally good agreement is found for the normal forces. The predictions of the bending moments are satisfying, but there are some discrepancies. It is shown that it might be necessary to consider assembly imperfections in the calculation models to improve the agreement between the calculation results and the measurements. Also, the differences between the calculation methods themselves are addressed. It is analyzed that generally continuum models give more realistic internal forces, but that also bedded beam models can have advantages, e.g. when large parametric studies are required. Finally, recommendations are given regarding the application of calculation models for structural design.

Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyVol. 154
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.