Mobile Health Apps: Guidance for Evaluation and Implementation by Healthcare Workers

Since app stores launched in 2008, the number of direct-to-consumer mobile health (mHealth) apps has grown to hundreds of thousands. mHealth apps are often unregulated by international regulatory agencies and rarely evaluated for effectiveness, quality, data security, and safety. Evaluation frameworks and scales exist, but the onus of evaluating mHealth apps remains on end users. This best practice review aims to facilitate clinical implementation of mHealth by providing healthcare professionals with practical guidance for evaluating mHealth apps. We searched online for evaluation frameworks, scales, and searchable databases that met inclusion criteria: accessible online, preferably peer reviewed, available in English, and focused on mHealth. Three frameworks, two scales, and two searchable databases met the criteria and are reviewed. Frameworks, scales, and searchable databases generally assess app accessibility/usability, subject/content quality, and effectiveness. However, data privacy/security and engagement are rarely measured, and clinical effectiveness is often of limited focus. Considerations for mHealth implementation with marginalized and international groups are also discussed. We propose evidence-based guidelines and information to evaluate and integrate mHealth apps into healthcare settings and patient treatment plans. To our knowledge, these are the first guidelines proposed specific to integrating mHealth apps into clinical practice. The guidance for making quality recommendations to patients is of high utility to providers and healthcare organizations wishing to support treatment plans and behavior change through technological adjuncts. Future research should focus on the use of evaluation frameworks and scales to improve mHealth implementation and health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00441-7
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobile Health Apps: Guidance for Evaluation and Implementation by Healthcare Workers

Christine E. Garver‐Apgar, Matthew C. Mishkind, Teresa Mescher, Chad D. Morris et al.
10 citations
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
8.49
article

Mobile Health Apps: Guidance for Evaluation and Implementation by Healthcare Workers

Christine E. Garver‐Apgar, Matthew C. Mishkind, Teresa Mescher, Chad D. Morris, Robyn L. Hacker, Liliane Martinez
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Since app stores launched in 2008, the number of direct-to-consumer mobile health (mHealth) apps has grown to hundreds of thousands. mHealth apps are often unregulated by international regulatory agencies and rarely evaluated for effectiveness, quality, data security, and safety. Evaluation frameworks and scales exist, but the onus of evaluating mHealth apps remains on end users. This best practice review aims to facilitate clinical implementation of mHealth by providing healthcare professionals with practical guidance for evaluating mHealth apps. We searched online for evaluation frameworks, scales, and searchable databases that met inclusion criteria: accessible online, preferably peer reviewed, available in English, and focused on mHealth. Three frameworks, two scales, and two searchable databases met the criteria and are reviewed. Frameworks, scales, and searchable databases generally assess app accessibility/usability, subject/content quality, and effectiveness. However, data privacy/security and engagement are rarely measured, and clinical effectiveness is often of limited focus. Considerations for mHealth implementation with marginalized and international groups are also discussed. We propose evidence-based guidelines and information to evaluate and integrate mHealth apps into healthcare settings and patient treatment plans. To our knowledge, these are the first guidelines proposed specific to integrating mHealth apps into clinical practice. The guidance for making quality recommendations to patients is of high utility to providers and healthcare organizations wishing to support treatment plans and behavior change through technological adjuncts. Future research should focus on the use of evaluation frameworks and scales to improve mHealth implementation and health outcomes.

Journal of Technology in Behavioral ScienceVol. 10(2)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
8.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.