Use of Party-Appointed Experts in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration: Issues and Possible Solutions

In this article, experts in international commercial and investment arbitration will be briefly explained on the basis of the appointing authority and the subject matter on which they provide their services. The legal aspects of experts will be summarised, taking into consideration sources in international arbitration and various jurisdictions. The problems that arise from the use of party-appointed experts are then briefly mentioned. Penultimately, the already proposed recommendations are to be stated and evaluated. Last but not least, the article concludes by asserting that a pre-agreed procedural flow for the creation of the expert opinion and concurrent examination is necessary to overcome the flaws resulting from the use of party-appointed experts that lead to the inefficiency of proceedings. To limit the subject, this article intentionally does not address the experts’ appointment and objection process and issues relating to the expert’s opinion, specifically, the assessment and weight as evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.75.0007
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Party-Appointed Experts in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration: Issues and Possible Solutions

Ömer Kafali
Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Use of Party-Appointed Experts in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration: Issues and Possible Solutions

Ömer Kafali
article en

Abstract

In this article, experts in international commercial and investment arbitration will be briefly explained on the basis of the appointing authority and the subject matter on which they provide their services. The legal aspects of experts will be summarised, taking into consideration sources in international arbitration and various jurisdictions. The problems that arise from the use of party-appointed experts are then briefly mentioned. Penultimately, the already proposed recommendations are to be stated and evaluated. Last but not least, the article concludes by asserting that a pre-agreed procedural flow for the creation of the expert opinion and concurrent examination is necessary to overcome the flaws resulting from the use of party-appointed experts that lead to the inefficiency of proceedings. To limit the subject, this article intentionally does not address the experts’ appointment and objection process and issues relating to the expert’s opinion, specifically, the assessment and weight as evidence.

Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’IstanbulVol. 0(75)
Environmental Law Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.