Economic Hardship and Support for Redistribution: Synthesising Five Themes in the Literature

Does becoming poorer always cause people to shift their attitudes towards higher demand for redistribution? Through a systematic review of the literature on this question, we reveal five important themes in existing research: a person’s current income, their future expectations, their expectations about redistribution benefits, their income in early life and their attitudes towards beneficiaries. Identifying these themes helps explain why responses to economic hardship are variable and heterogeneous, and can very usefully guide future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies Review
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241280945
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Hardship and Support for Redistribution: Synthesising Five Themes in the Literature

Jane Green, Alex Yeandle, Tiphaine Le Corre
Political Studies Review
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Economic Hardship and Support for Redistribution: Synthesising Five Themes in the Literature

Jane Green, Alex Yeandle, Tiphaine Le Corre
article en

Abstract

Does becoming poorer always cause people to shift their attitudes towards higher demand for redistribution? Through a systematic review of the literature on this question, we reveal five important themes in existing research: a person’s current income, their future expectations, their expectations about redistribution benefits, their income in early life and their attitudes towards beneficiaries. Identifying these themes helps explain why responses to economic hardship are variable and heterogeneous, and can very usefully guide future research.

Political Studies ReviewVol. 22(4)
University of Oxford (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
University of Oxford, Nuffield College, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.