Rethinking Our Approach to Understanding Violence in Carceral Institutions: A Call for Incorporating Public Management Perspectives

Much of the empirical work on carceral violence has relied on importation and deprivation theories, with limited work focusing on associations with institutional management practices. To examine the extent to which these areas of opportunity exist in studying carceral violence, this paper employs a mapping review, assessing which factors tend to be most incorporated into empirical work on carceral violence. Results suggest that much of the literature is driven by individual-level, prison data in the US context, published in criminology journals, and seldomly controls for factors related to the staff and their engagement with or perceptions of incarcerated people. Empirical work on carceral violence may benefit from greater nuance and incorporation of public management perspectives to better mitigate carceral violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241285406
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Our Approach to Understanding Violence in Carceral Institutions: A Call for Incorporating Public Management Perspectives

Jessie Harney
1 citations
Crime & Delinquency
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
0.53
article

Rethinking Our Approach to Understanding Violence in Carceral Institutions: A Call for Incorporating Public Management Perspectives

Jessie Harney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Much of the empirical work on carceral violence has relied on importation and deprivation theories, with limited work focusing on associations with institutional management practices. To examine the extent to which these areas of opportunity exist in studying carceral violence, this paper employs a mapping review, assessing which factors tend to be most incorporated into empirical work on carceral violence. Results suggest that much of the literature is driven by individual-level, prison data in the US context, published in criminology journals, and seldomly controls for factors related to the staff and their engagement with or perceptions of incarcerated people. Empirical work on carceral violence may benefit from greater nuance and incorporation of public management perspectives to better mitigate carceral violence.

Crime & Delinquency
Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking Our Approach to Understanding Violence in Carceral Institutions: A Call for Incorporating Public Management Perspectives — Jessie Harney · Crime & Delinquency (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS