Midterm Outcomes of Patients With Complex Aortic Aneurysms Treated Using Mixed and Matched Endoprosthesis From Different Manufacturers

The use of mixed devices proximal and distal to f/b-devices built to treat patients with cAAs is safe and has good mid-term results.Clinical ImpactWhile not yet formally assessed in randomized clinical trials or endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the practice of utilizing devices from various manufacturers to address complex aortic anatomy is widespread in everyday clinical settings, yet outcomes remain insufficiently documented. To our knowledge, ours is the first manuscript demonstrating that the use of endoprostheses from different manufacturers for treating patients with complex aortic aneurysms is both safe and yields favorable mid-term results. This frequently employed strategy warrants further exploration through meticulously designed clinical trials, aiming to furnish vascular specialists with a well-founded guideline based on robust clinical evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241283252
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midterm Outcomes of Patients With Complex Aortic Aneurysms Treated Using Mixed and Matched Endoprosthesis From Different Manufacturers

Hamza Hanif, Nedaa Skeik, Muhammad Ali Rana, Kevin M. Harris et al.
1 citations
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
0.42
article

Midterm Outcomes of Patients With Complex Aortic Aneurysms Treated Using Mixed and Matched Endoprosthesis From Different Manufacturers

Hamza Hanif, Nedaa Skeik, Muhammad Ali Rana, Kevin M. Harris, Ross Clark, Elliot Stephenson, Jesse Manunga, Ellen Cravero, JoAnn Goldman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of mixed devices proximal and distal to f/b-devices built to treat patients with cAAs is safe and has good mid-term results.Clinical ImpactWhile not yet formally assessed in randomized clinical trials or endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the practice of utilizing devices from various manufacturers to address complex aortic anatomy is widespread in everyday clinical settings, yet outcomes remain insufficiently documented. To our knowledge, ours is the first manuscript demonstrating that the use of endoprostheses from different manufacturers for treating patients with complex aortic aneurysms is both safe and yields favorable mid-term results. This frequently employed strategy warrants further exploration through meticulously designed clinical trials, aiming to furnish vascular specialists with a well-founded guideline based on robust clinical evidence.

Journal of Endovascular TherapyVol. 33(2)
Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US), University of New Mexico (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Midterm Outcomes of Patients With Complex Aortic Aneurysms Treated Using Mixed and Matched Endoprosthesis From Different Manufacturers — Hamza Hanif, Nedaa Skeik, et al. · Journal of Endovascular Therapy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS