Hot spots drive uptake and short‐term processing of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen in intertidal sediments

Abstract This study uses dual‐labeled ( 13 C and 15 N) stable isotope applications to examine microbial uptake and short‐term processing of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) from organic and inorganic compounds in subtropical intertidal sediment. Four treatment applications were applied: (1) algal dissolved organic matter (DOM), (2) amino acid mixture, (3) glucose and , and (4) NaHCO 3 and to assess bioavailability effects on processing (1 vs. 2) and short‐term processing for OM fixed via microphytobenthos only (pennate diatom dominated) (4) vs. material taken up by the entire microbial community (3) across 24 h. 13 C from algal‐DOM was preferentially used by the microbial community vs. 15 N. At 24 h more 13 C from algal‐DOM remained in microbial biomass indicating use of labeled precursor molecules to form biomass. Conversely, 13 C from the amino acid treatment was not incorporated into biomass and was either rapidly respired to DIC or discarded as the in situ microbial community preferentially used and retained 15 N from amino acids. Short‐term export of 13 C as CO 2 from glucose was lower than from microphytobenthos‐C, while retention of 15 N from was similar between treatments (3 and 4) despite doubling the application N concentration, suggesting potentially higher glucose‐stimulated 15 N export via nitrification–denitrification that was not confirmed via flux measurements in this study. Despite careful site selection for similar tidal exposure and sediment types among the three estuaries, the uptake and processing of labeled substrate varied substantially between replicates and sites which challenged traditional statistical analysis. Disproportionate processing of substrates occurring in sediment hotspots of microbial activity can cause variability spanning orders of magnitude which was found to be widespread through comparison of our results against 19 previous studies in intertidal settings. Development of robust analytical techniques to handle variability from abiotic and biotic factors will allow greater clarity surrounding in situ biogeochemical processing in intertidal environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12670
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hot spots drive uptake and short‐term processing of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen in intertidal sediments

Marcel T. J. van der Meer, Philip M. Riekenberg, Bradley D. Eyre, Joanne M. Oakes
1 citations
Limnology and Oceanography
Marine and coastal ecosystems
0.48
article

Hot spots drive uptake and short‐term processing of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen in intertidal sediments

Marcel T. J. van der Meer, Philip M. Riekenberg, Bradley D. Eyre, Joanne M. Oakes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study uses dual‐labeled ( 13 C and 15 N) stable isotope applications to examine microbial uptake and short‐term processing of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) from organic and inorganic compounds in subtropical intertidal sediment. Four treatment applications were applied: (1) algal dissolved organic matter (DOM), (2) amino acid mixture, (3) glucose and , and (4) NaHCO 3 and to assess bioavailability effects on processing (1 vs. 2) and short‐term processing for OM fixed via microphytobenthos only (pennate diatom dominated) (4) vs. material taken up by the entire microbial community (3) across 24 h. 13 C from algal‐DOM was preferentially used by the microbial community vs. 15 N. At 24 h more 13 C from algal‐DOM remained in microbial biomass indicating use of labeled precursor molecules to form biomass. Conversely, 13 C from the amino acid treatment was not incorporated into biomass and was either rapidly respired to DIC or discarded as the in situ microbial community preferentially used and retained 15 N from amino acids. Short‐term export of 13 C as CO 2 from glucose was lower than from microphytobenthos‐C, while retention of 15 N from was similar between treatments (3 and 4) despite doubling the application N concentration, suggesting potentially higher glucose‐stimulated 15 N export via nitrification–denitrification that was not confirmed via flux measurements in this study. Despite careful site selection for similar tidal exposure and sediment types among the three estuaries, the uptake and processing of labeled substrate varied substantially between replicates and sites which challenged traditional statistical analysis. Disproportionate processing of substrates occurring in sediment hotspots of microbial activity can cause variability spanning orders of magnitude which was found to be widespread through comparison of our results against 19 previous studies in intertidal settings. Development of robust analytical techniques to handle variability from abiotic and biotic factors will allow greater clarity surrounding in situ biogeochemical processing in intertidal environments.

Limnology and OceanographyVol. 69(10)
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), Southern Cross University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.