Global Observations of Geomagnetically Induced Currents Caused by an Extremely Intense Density Pulse During a Coronal Mass Ejection
Abstract A variety of magnetosphere‐ionosphere current systems and waves have been linked to geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) and geomagnetically induced currents (GIC). However, since many location‐specific factors control GMD and GIC intensity, it is often unclear what mechanisms generate the largest GMD and GIC in different locations. We address this challenge through analysis of multi‐satellite measurements and globally distributed magnetometer and GIC measurements. We find embedded within the magnetic cloud of the 23–24 April 2023 coronal mass ejection (CME) storm there was a global scale density pulse lasting for 10–20 min with compression ratio of . It caused substantial dayside displacements of the bow shock and magnetopause, changes of and , respectively, which in turn caused large amplitude GMD in the magnetosphere and on the ground across a wide local time range. At the time this global GMD was observed, GIC measured in New Zealand, Finland, Canada, and the United States were observed. The GIC were comparable (within factors of 2–2.5) to the largest ever recorded during 14 year monitoring intervals in New Zealand and Finland and represented 2‐year maxima in the United States during a period with several Kp7 geomagnetic storms. Additionally, the GIC measurements in the USA and other mid‐latitude locations exhibited wave‐like fluctuations with 1–2 min period. This work suggests that large density pulses in CME should be considered an important driver of large amplitude, global GMD and among the largest GIC at mid‐latitude locations, and that sampling intervals are required to capture these GMD/GIC.
Authors
- Ryan Cui
- Craig J. Rodger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2707)
- Hannah Parry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-6563)
- Hadi Madanian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2234-5312)
- Daniel H. Mac Manus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-2251)
- Terry Z. Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-4289)
- Michael D Dalzell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-6765)
- A. Viljanen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-1786)
- I. R. Mann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7841)
- Xueling Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-8241)
- Yi Qi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0959-3450)
- Michael D. Hartinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-2202)
- V. Angelopoulos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-1561)
- Darcy Cordell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1935)
- Chen Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-7085)
- G. Young-Morris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-1344)
- Ryan MacMullin
- Jeffrey Streifling
- Christian Noël
Institutions
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- NSF NCAR High Altitude Observatory (US)
- Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI)
- Space Science Institute (US)
- Planetary Science Institute (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US)
- Energie NB Power (Canada) (CA)
- Transpower (New Zealand) (NZ)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Virginia Tech (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Space Weather
- Published
- 2024-09-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw003993
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.33
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission