Physical Therapist Faculty Perceptions of Barriers Related to High Fidelity Simulation Manikins

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this basic interpretive qualitative study was to explore physical therapist faculty members’ perceptions of barriers related to teaching with high fidelity simulation (HFS) manikins within the Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) curriculum. Case Description: Eight physical therapist faculty members with no experience teaching with HFS manikins participated in semi-structured one-on-one interviews to understand their perceptions of barriers to this type of HFS as a teaching methodology within the DPT curriculum. Outcomes: Three overarching themes arose through qualitative analysis, which describe participants’ perceptions. Major themes were: (1) HFS manikins are unnecessary to achieve course objectives; (2) HFS manikins are not human; and (3) Teaching with HFS manikins may not be worth the effort. Discussion and Conclusion: The findings of this study can assist DPT programs, faculty, and Program Directors consider including HFS manikins into the curriculum by increasing awareness of potential barriers among those individuals who have not taught with HFS manikins. Further research is warranted to continue to explore the evolving role this technology has in the DPT curriculum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000241
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Therapist Faculty Perceptions of Barriers Related to High Fidelity Simulation Manikins

R. Thomas, Steve Wiley, Lisa Borrero, Kristin Curry Greenwood
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Physical Therapist Faculty Perceptions of Barriers Related to High Fidelity Simulation Manikins

R. Thomas, Steve Wiley, Lisa Borrero, Kristin Curry Greenwood
article en

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this basic interpretive qualitative study was to explore physical therapist faculty members’ perceptions of barriers related to teaching with high fidelity simulation (HFS) manikins within the Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) curriculum. Case Description: Eight physical therapist faculty members with no experience teaching with HFS manikins participated in semi-structured one-on-one interviews to understand their perceptions of barriers to this type of HFS as a teaching methodology within the DPT curriculum. Outcomes: Three overarching themes arose through qualitative analysis, which describe participants’ perceptions. Major themes were: (1) HFS manikins are unnecessary to achieve course objectives; (2) HFS manikins are not human; and (3) Teaching with HFS manikins may not be worth the effort. Discussion and Conclusion: The findings of this study can assist DPT programs, faculty, and Program Directors consider including HFS manikins into the curriculum by increasing awareness of potential barriers among those individuals who have not taught with HFS manikins. Further research is warranted to continue to explore the evolving role this technology has in the DPT curriculum.

Journal of Acute Care Physical TherapyVol. 15(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physical Therapist Faculty Perceptions of Barriers Related to High Fidelity Simulation Manikins — R. Thomas, Steve Wiley, et al. · Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS