Test-retest reliability of exercise blood pressure and the workload-indexed systolic blood pressure slope in healthy males and females

The reliability of blood pressure (BP) measured during submaximal and maximal exercise, and confounding effects of biological sex, remain to be fully established but have implications for using exercise BP as a cardiovascular risk factor. We hypothesize that exercise BP test-retest reliability will not differ between sexes but will be higher during submaximal compared to maximal exercise. Eighty-four participants (22 ± 5 yr; 36 females) completed two maximal treadmill tests (modified Bruce protocol) separated by ≥2 days. Exercise BP was measured every 90 s using automated auscultation (Tango M2 monitor). Breath-by-breath oxygen uptake was analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed using two-way, mixed-effects, consistency, single-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis on the total group and separated by sex at submaximal and maximal exercise. Systolic BP during submaximal (ICC = 0.65 [0.49-0.76], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and maximal (ICC = 0.66 [0.52-0.77], <i>P</i> < 0.01) exercise both displayed substantial reliability between visits. In contrast, the SBP/MET slope showed poor submaximal (ICC = 0.12 [-0.09-0.33], <i>P</i> = 0.13) but substantial maximal (ICC = 0.63 [0.48-0.75], <i>P</i> < 0.01) exercise reliability. Females showed substantial reliability in submaximal systolic BP (ICC = 0.73 [0.53-0.85], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and peak systolic BP (ICC = 0.74 [0.54-0.87], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and SBP/MET slope (ICC = 0.78 [0.60-0.88], <i>P</i> < 0.01); the submaximal SBP/MET slope had fair reliability (ICC = 0.28 [-0.06-0.56], <i>P</i> = 0.05). Males showed moderate reliability in submaximal systolic BP (ICC = 0.53 [0.26-0.72], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and peak systolic BP (ICC = 0.41 [0.15-0.62], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and SBP/MET slope (ICC = 0.48 [0.22-0.67], <i>P</i> < 0.01); the submaximal SBP/MET slope had poor reliability (ICC = 0.06 [-0.18-0.31], <i>P</i> = 0.32). Systolic BP showed similar reliability during submaximal and maximal exercise, with females demonstrating higher reliability in exercise systolic BP compared to males.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Limited work has assessed the reliability of exercise blood pressure (BP) in young healthy males and females. Our results demonstrate that systolic BP test-retest reliability did not differ between submaximal and maximal exercise. Sex-specific analysis found that females had higher reliability in exercise systolic BP than males. Despite the acceptable average reliability, exercise BP measured using automated auscultation possesses wide confidence intervals, which impact sample size requirements in future trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00493.2024
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test-retest reliability of exercise blood pressure and the workload-indexed systolic blood pressure slope in healthy males and females

Philip J. Millar, Julian C. Bommarito, Massimo Nardone, Pardeep K Khangura et al.
3 citations
Journal of Applied Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.15
article

Test-retest reliability of exercise blood pressure and the workload-indexed systolic blood pressure slope in healthy males and females

Philip J. Millar, Julian C. Bommarito, Massimo Nardone, Pardeep K Khangura, Rileigh K Stapleton, Tanvir S Matharu, Alise D Rycroft, Leilani C Rocha, Sydney E Hilton
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The reliability of blood pressure (BP) measured during submaximal and maximal exercise, and confounding effects of biological sex, remain to be fully established but have implications for using exercise BP as a cardiovascular risk factor. We hypothesize that exercise BP test-retest reliability will not differ between sexes but will be higher during submaximal compared to maximal exercise. Eighty-four participants (22 ± 5 yr; 36 females) completed two maximal treadmill tests (modified Bruce protocol) separated by ≥2 days. Exercise BP was measured every 90 s using automated auscultation (Tango M2 monitor). Breath-by-breath oxygen uptake was analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed using two-way, mixed-effects, consistency, single-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis on the total group and separated by sex at submaximal and maximal exercise. Systolic BP during submaximal (ICC = 0.65 [0.49-0.76], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and maximal (ICC = 0.66 [0.52-0.77], <i>P</i> < 0.01) exercise both displayed substantial reliability between visits. In contrast, the SBP/MET slope showed poor submaximal (ICC = 0.12 [-0.09-0.33], <i>P</i> = 0.13) but substantial maximal (ICC = 0.63 [0.48-0.75], <i>P</i> < 0.01) exercise reliability. Females showed substantial reliability in submaximal systolic BP (ICC = 0.73 [0.53-0.85], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and peak systolic BP (ICC = 0.74 [0.54-0.87], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and SBP/MET slope (ICC = 0.78 [0.60-0.88], <i>P</i> < 0.01); the submaximal SBP/MET slope had fair reliability (ICC = 0.28 [-0.06-0.56], <i>P</i> = 0.05). Males showed moderate reliability in submaximal systolic BP (ICC = 0.53 [0.26-0.72], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and peak systolic BP (ICC = 0.41 [0.15-0.62], <i>P</i> < 0.01) and SBP/MET slope (ICC = 0.48 [0.22-0.67], <i>P</i> < 0.01); the submaximal SBP/MET slope had poor reliability (ICC = 0.06 [-0.18-0.31], <i>P</i> = 0.32). Systolic BP showed similar reliability during submaximal and maximal exercise, with females demonstrating higher reliability in exercise systolic BP compared to males.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Limited work has assessed the reliability of exercise blood pressure (BP) in young healthy males and females. Our results demonstrate that systolic BP test-retest reliability did not differ between submaximal and maximal exercise. Sex-specific analysis found that females had higher reliability in exercise systolic BP than males. Despite the acceptable average reliability, exercise BP measured using automated auscultation possesses wide confidence intervals, which impact sample size requirements in future trials.

Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 137(5)
University of Guelph (CA)
American Physiological Society, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.