Factors associated with successful FLOW implementation to improve mental health access: a mixed-methods study

The FLOW program assists mental health providers in transitioning recovered and stabilized specialty mental health (SMH) patients to primary care to increase access to SMH care. In a recent cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial, nine VA sites implemented the FLOW program with wide variation in implementation success. The goal of this study is to identify site-level factors associated with successful implementation of the FLOW program, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used the Matrixed Multiple Case Study method, a mixed-methods approach, to compare key metrics hypothesized to impact implementation that were aligned with CFIR. Based upon the number of veterans transitioned at each site, we categorized two sites as higher implementation success, three as medium, and four as lower implementation success. Themes associated with more successful implementation included perceptions of the intervention itself (CFIR domain Innovation), having a culture of recovery-oriented care and prioritizing implementation over competing demands (CFIR domain Inner Setting), had lower mental health provider turnover, and had an internal facilitator who was well-positioned for FLOW implementation, such as having a leadership role or connections across several clinics (CFIR domain Characteristics of Individuals). Other variables, including staffing levels, leadership support, and organizational readiness to change did not have a consistent relationship to implementation success. These data may assist in identifying sites that are likely to need additional implementation support to succeed at implementing FLOW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with successful FLOW implementation to improve mental health access: a mixed-methods study

Natalie E. Hundt, Amber B. Amspoker, Bo Kim, Maribel Plasencia et al.
2 citations
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
article

Factors associated with successful FLOW implementation to improve mental health access: a mixed-methods study

Natalie E. Hundt, Amber B. Amspoker, Bo Kim, Maribel Plasencia, Annette Walder, Herbert T. Nagamoto, Lorna Smith Benjamin, Zenab I. Yusuf, Christie Ga-jing Tsao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The FLOW program assists mental health providers in transitioning recovered and stabilized specialty mental health (SMH) patients to primary care to increase access to SMH care. In a recent cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial, nine VA sites implemented the FLOW program with wide variation in implementation success. The goal of this study is to identify site-level factors associated with successful implementation of the FLOW program, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used the Matrixed Multiple Case Study method, a mixed-methods approach, to compare key metrics hypothesized to impact implementation that were aligned with CFIR. Based upon the number of veterans transitioned at each site, we categorized two sites as higher implementation success, three as medium, and four as lower implementation success. Themes associated with more successful implementation included perceptions of the intervention itself (CFIR domain Innovation), having a culture of recovery-oriented care and prioritizing implementation over competing demands (CFIR domain Inner Setting), had lower mental health provider turnover, and had an internal facilitator who was well-positioned for FLOW implementation, such as having a leadership role or connections across several clinics (CFIR domain Characteristics of Individuals). Other variables, including staffing levels, leadership support, and organizational readiness to change did not have a consistent relationship to implementation success. These data may assist in identifying sites that are likely to need additional implementation support to succeed at implementing FLOW.

Translational Behavioral MedicineVol. 14(12)
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), VA Rocky Mountain Network (US), Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.