Exploring the urban-rural dichotomies in post-pandemic migration intention: Empirical evidence from Europe

Since the beginning of the 21st century, we have been living in the ‘urban century’, characterised by a rise in the number of cities and mega-cities and a structural population increase in most cities, to the detriment of rural areas. Given the declining interest in rurality, the aims and scope of this paper are to map out the complex force field of rurality versus urbanity, and explore if the COVID pandemic has become a ‘game changer’ that thus may swift the existing patterns. Relying on multilevel modelling, to also account for between-country differences, and using Eurobarometer data on post-pandemic migration intention in both rural and urban areas, our results do not find support for a major post-covid urban exodus. Younger individuals from large cities are indeed more willing to leave for rural areas when they are convinced that they can play an active role in the local decision-making process. Teleworking, as well as EU concrete actions for addressing environmental issues, may also drive more migration toward rural areas. On the other hand, poor access to health services may push individuals towards urban areas. In policy terms, our findings advocate for improving access to public services in rural areas. In addition, the study reinforces the role of the Cohesion Policy to urge the twin transition, as facilitating teleworking and strengthening the environmental commitment were shown to make rural areas more appealing. • The pandemic did not generate a mass movement between rural and urban areas. • Individuals from large cities were shown to be more willing to leave for rural places. • EU investment alignment with rural needs may spur migration to rural areas. • The role of the Cohesion Policy in supporting green transition is vital as migration to rural areas rises with environmentally focused EU actions. • Rural digitalization may further reduce urban agglomeration in favour of more rural spaces which also advocates for the importance of digital transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103428
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the urban-rural dichotomies in post-pandemic migration intention: Empirical evidence from Europe

Cristian Încalțărău, Gabriela Carmen Pascariu, Karima Kourtit
5 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Urbanization and City Planning
9.79
article

Exploring the urban-rural dichotomies in post-pandemic migration intention: Empirical evidence from Europe

Cristian Încalțărău, Gabriela Carmen Pascariu, Karima Kourtit
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 21st century, we have been living in the ‘urban century’, characterised by a rise in the number of cities and mega-cities and a structural population increase in most cities, to the detriment of rural areas. Given the declining interest in rurality, the aims and scope of this paper are to map out the complex force field of rurality versus urbanity, and explore if the COVID pandemic has become a ‘game changer’ that thus may swift the existing patterns. Relying on multilevel modelling, to also account for between-country differences, and using Eurobarometer data on post-pandemic migration intention in both rural and urban areas, our results do not find support for a major post-covid urban exodus. Younger individuals from large cities are indeed more willing to leave for rural areas when they are convinced that they can play an active role in the local decision-making process. Teleworking, as well as EU concrete actions for addressing environmental issues, may also drive more migration toward rural areas. On the other hand, poor access to health services may push individuals towards urban areas. In policy terms, our findings advocate for improving access to public services in rural areas. In addition, the study reinforces the role of the Cohesion Policy to urge the twin transition, as facilitating teleworking and strengthening the environmental commitment were shown to make rural areas more appealing. • The pandemic did not generate a mass movement between rural and urban areas. • Individuals from large cities were shown to be more willing to leave for rural places. • EU investment alignment with rural needs may spur migration to rural areas. • The role of the Cohesion Policy in supporting green transition is vital as migration to rural areas rises with environmentally focused EU actions. • Rural digitalization may further reduce urban agglomeration in favour of more rural spaces which also advocates for the importance of digital transition.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 111
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urbanization and City Planning
9.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.