A comparative analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for short-term grid power forecasting and uncertainty analysis of Wave Energy Converters

Wave Energy is one of the renewable sources with greatest potential. Since power coming from waves fluctuates, the grid integration of wave energy involves several power conditioning stages to comply with grid quality requirements. However, to ensure full integration of wave energy in a smart grid scenario and unlock advanced monitoring and control techniques (e.g. Demand/Response), it is crucial to forecast the output power. This work proposes a methodology to forecast in short-term horizons (i.e. 15 min to 240 min) the power delivered to the grid of the Inertial Sea Wave Energy Converter (ISWEC), a device that harnesses wave power through the inertial effect of a gyroscope. Therefore, we designed, optimized and compared the performance of five known machine learning techniques for time series point forecasting: Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network, Transformer Neural Network and 1 Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Additionally, we studied the efficacy of downsampling technique aggregating original dataset sampled every 0.1 s in time steps of 1min, 3min, 5min and 15min to compare the performance behaviour of the different machine learning models for these datasets. Furthermore, we implemented Prediction Intervals (PIs) to calculate the inherent uncertainties associated with the previously mentioned machine learning techniques. These PIs were built based on the Non-Parametric Kernel Density Estimator technique. The point forecasting and the PIs results showed that models’ performance improved as the downsampling increased. Moreover, the Random Forest model was the worst-performing in all cases. Finally, none of the other models can be considered the best overall.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109352
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for short-term grid power forecasting and uncertainty analysis of Wave Energy Converters

Enrico Macii, Giuliana Mattiazzo, Edoardo Pasta, Sergej Antonello Sirigu et al.
7 citations
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
1.46
article

A comparative analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for short-term grid power forecasting and uncertainty analysis of Wave Energy Converters

Enrico Macii, Giuliana Mattiazzo, Edoardo Pasta, Sergej Antonello Sirigu, Alessandro Aliberti, Edoardo Patti, Lorenzo Bottaccioli, Rafael Natalio Fontana Crespo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Wave Energy is one of the renewable sources with greatest potential. Since power coming from waves fluctuates, the grid integration of wave energy involves several power conditioning stages to comply with grid quality requirements. However, to ensure full integration of wave energy in a smart grid scenario and unlock advanced monitoring and control techniques (e.g. Demand/Response), it is crucial to forecast the output power. This work proposes a methodology to forecast in short-term horizons (i.e. 15 min to 240 min) the power delivered to the grid of the Inertial Sea Wave Energy Converter (ISWEC), a device that harnesses wave power through the inertial effect of a gyroscope. Therefore, we designed, optimized and compared the performance of five known machine learning techniques for time series point forecasting: Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network, Transformer Neural Network and 1 Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network. Additionally, we studied the efficacy of downsampling technique aggregating original dataset sampled every 0.1 s in time steps of 1min, 3min, 5min and 15min to compare the performance behaviour of the different machine learning models for these datasets. Furthermore, we implemented Prediction Intervals (PIs) to calculate the inherent uncertainties associated with the previously mentioned machine learning techniques. These PIs were built based on the Non-Parametric Kernel Density Estimator technique. The point forecasting and the PIs results showed that models’ performance improved as the downsampling increased. Moreover, the Random Forest model was the worst-performing in all cases. Finally, none of the other models can be considered the best overall.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 138
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.