Bridging the gap: Linking prototyping and technology readiness levels for integrative product development

Shorter development cycles, increasing complexity due to the interaction of hardware and software and the simultaneous pressure to innovate and reduce costs lead to products being launched early that have not yet been sufficiently validated and tested. The prototyping phase is crucial to ensure maturity as a preliminary stage to series production. Although this validation is critical to ensure the maturity of the product or technology to avoid recalls, previous research has focused on exploring the phenomenon of prototyping in general. To fill this gap, we use the standardized framework of technology readiness levels and develop prototyping readiness levels that allow for a graded assessment of maturity. Our empirical study is based on the unique case of the Boeing 737 Max 8 and a research project to develop an automated prototyping hub. Our findings show how mismanagement of prototypes and inadequate technology readiness level (TRL) assessment can lead to serious safety issues. Based on these findings, we introduce prototyping readiness levels that complement the idea of TRLs to reduce and eliminate bottlenecks and errors in the early stages of the development process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Creativity and Innovation Management
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12633
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: Linking prototyping and technology readiness levels for integrative product development

Laura Rehberg, Alexander Brem
1 citations
Creativity and Innovation Management
Technology Assessment and Management
0.36
article

Bridging the gap: Linking prototyping and technology readiness levels for integrative product development

Laura Rehberg, Alexander Brem
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Shorter development cycles, increasing complexity due to the interaction of hardware and software and the simultaneous pressure to innovate and reduce costs lead to products being launched early that have not yet been sufficiently validated and tested. The prototyping phase is crucial to ensure maturity as a preliminary stage to series production. Although this validation is critical to ensure the maturity of the product or technology to avoid recalls, previous research has focused on exploring the phenomenon of prototyping in general. To fill this gap, we use the standardized framework of technology readiness levels and develop prototyping readiness levels that allow for a graded assessment of maturity. Our empirical study is based on the unique case of the Boeing 737 Max 8 and a research project to develop an automated prototyping hub. Our findings show how mismanagement of prototypes and inadequate technology readiness level (TRL) assessment can lead to serious safety issues. Based on these findings, we introduce prototyping readiness levels that complement the idea of TRLs to reduce and eliminate bottlenecks and errors in the early stages of the development process.

Creativity and Innovation ManagementVol. 34(1)
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Technology Assessment and Management
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the gap: Linking prototyping and technology readiness levels for integrative product development — Laura Rehberg, Alexander Brem · Creativity and Innovation Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS