Comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour

Background: The aim was to study the comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour. The objective was to determine the level of agreement and to compare the findings of clinical examination with intrapartum ultrasound in the determination of fetal head station and position in labour. Methods: A prospective cohort study was done over a period of 12 months in a tertiary centre. 86 patients were followed up by digital vaginal examination and intrapartum ultrasound for determining the fetal head position and station in active labour. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage, and continuous variables presented as mean±SD and median. Qualitative variables were correlated using Chi-square test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The absolute agreement between DVE and intrapartum USG for determining FHP was 43.02% in labour with a composite agreement of 66.67%. The absolute agreement between DVE and Intrapartum USG for determining fetal head station was 68.6% in labour. Accuracy of ultrasound to correctly diagnose fetal head position in labour was found to be 82.14%. Conclusions: DVE is a subjective tool which can fail to detect the correct fetal head position and station in labour in presence of certain conditions like caput succedaneum and moulding during active labour.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242799
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour

Yashaswi Pandey, S. Tara Kalyani, K. S. Rajarajeshwari, G. C. Apernapriya
1 citations
International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
0.58
article

Comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour

Yashaswi Pandey, S. Tara Kalyani, K. S. Rajarajeshwari, G. C. Apernapriya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The aim was to study the comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour. The objective was to determine the level of agreement and to compare the findings of clinical examination with intrapartum ultrasound in the determination of fetal head station and position in labour. Methods: A prospective cohort study was done over a period of 12 months in a tertiary centre. 86 patients were followed up by digital vaginal examination and intrapartum ultrasound for determining the fetal head position and station in active labour. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage, and continuous variables presented as mean±SD and median. Qualitative variables were correlated using Chi-square test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The absolute agreement between DVE and intrapartum USG for determining FHP was 43.02% in labour with a composite agreement of 66.67%. The absolute agreement between DVE and Intrapartum USG for determining fetal head station was 68.6% in labour. Accuracy of ultrasound to correctly diagnose fetal head position in labour was found to be 82.14%. Conclusions: DVE is a subjective tool which can fail to detect the correct fetal head position and station in labour in presence of certain conditions like caput succedaneum and moulding during active labour.

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 13(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound parameters to assess fetal head station and position in labour — Yashaswi Pandey, S. Tara Kalyani, et al. · International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS