Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models ( <i>δ</i> HBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)

Abstract. Accurate hydrologic modeling is vital to characterizing how the terrestrial water cycle responds to climate change. Pure deep learning (DL) models have been shown to outperform process-based ones while remaining difficult to interpret. More recently, differentiable physics-informed machine learning models with a physical backbone can systematically integrate physical equations and DL, predicting untrained variables and processes with high performance. However, it is unclear if such models are competitive for global-scale applications with a simple backbone. Therefore, we use – for the first time at this scale – differentiable hydrologic models (full name δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL, shortened to δHBV here) to simulate the rainfall–runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world. Moreover, we compare the δHBV models to a purely data-driven long short-term memory (LSTM) model to examine their strengths and limitations. Both LSTM and the δHBV models provide competitive daily hydrologic simulation capabilities in global basins, with median Kling–Gupta efficiency values close to or higher than 0.7 (and 0.78 with LSTM for a subset of 1675 basins with long-term discharge records), significantly outperforming traditional models. Moreover, regionalized differentiable models demonstrated stronger spatial generalization ability (median KGE 0.64) than a traditional parameter regionalization approach (median KGE 0.46) and even LSTM for ungauged region tests across continents. Nevertheless, relative to LSTM, the differentiable model was hampered by structural deficiencies for cold or polar regions, highly arid regions, and basins with significant human impacts. This study also sets the benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds a foundation for improving global hydrologic simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024
Citations
35
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models ( δ HBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)

Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Kathryn Lawson, Yoshihide Wada et al.
35 citations
Geoscientific model development
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
7.06
article

Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models ( δ HBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)

Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Kathryn Lawson, Yoshihide Wada, Ming Pan, Jiangtao Liu, Hylke E. Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Chaopeng Shen, Dapeng Feng
article en
35 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate hydrologic modeling is vital to characterizing how the terrestrial water cycle responds to climate change. Pure deep learning (DL) models have been shown to outperform process-based ones while remaining difficult to interpret. More recently, differentiable physics-informed machine learning models with a physical backbone can systematically integrate physical equations and DL, predicting untrained variables and processes with high performance. However, it is unclear if such models are competitive for global-scale applications with a simple backbone. Therefore, we use – for the first time at this scale – differentiable hydrologic models (full name δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL, shortened to δHBV here) to simulate the rainfall–runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world. Moreover, we compare the δHBV models to a purely data-driven long short-term memory (LSTM) model to examine their strengths and limitations. Both LSTM and the δHBV models provide competitive daily hydrologic simulation capabilities in global basins, with median Kling–Gupta efficiency values close to or higher than 0.7 (and 0.78 with LSTM for a subset of 1675 basins with long-term discharge records), significantly outperforming traditional models. Moreover, regionalized differentiable models demonstrated stronger spatial generalization ability (median KGE 0.64) than a traditional parameter regionalization approach (median KGE 0.46) and even LSTM for ungauged region tests across continents. Nevertheless, relative to LSTM, the differentiable model was hampered by structural deficiencies for cold or polar regions, highly arid regions, and basins with significant human impacts. This study also sets the benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds a foundation for improving global hydrologic simulations.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 17(18)
Pennsylvania State University (US), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), University of California San Diego (US), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, Google, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
7.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.