LEADERSHIP STYLES AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: MEDIATING EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS IN DESPOTIC AND ETHICAL LEADERSHIP

This study investigates the impact of despotic and ethical leadership upon employees’ engagement, focusing on the mediating role of psychological distress. Using a quantitative approach with data collected from employees in manufacturing SMEs, research analyzes the direct and indirect effects of different leadership styles on employee engagement. The findings reveal that despotic leadership negatively affects employee engagement both directly and indirectly over increased psychological distress, highlighting the detrimental impact of authoritarian leadership styles. Conversely, ethical leadership positively influences the employees’ engagement by reducing psychological distress, underscoring the benefits of ethical leadership in fostering a supportive work environment. The study's results emphasize the importance of addressing psychological distress to enhance employee engagement. The recommendations include that implementing leadership development programs and prioritizing mental health initiatives to improve employee well-being and productivity. The study contributes to literature by elucidating complex relationships amid leadership styles, psychological distress and employee engagement offering insights for the organizational effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gomal University Journal of Research
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-40-03-04
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEADERSHIP STYLES AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: MEDIATING EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS IN DESPOTIC AND ETHICAL LEADERSHIP

Basharat Raza, Muhammad Shan, Shrafat Ali Sair
Gomal University Journal of Research
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

LEADERSHIP STYLES AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: MEDIATING EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS IN DESPOTIC AND ETHICAL LEADERSHIP

Basharat Raza, Muhammad Shan, Shrafat Ali Sair
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of despotic and ethical leadership upon employees’ engagement, focusing on the mediating role of psychological distress. Using a quantitative approach with data collected from employees in manufacturing SMEs, research analyzes the direct and indirect effects of different leadership styles on employee engagement. The findings reveal that despotic leadership negatively affects employee engagement both directly and indirectly over increased psychological distress, highlighting the detrimental impact of authoritarian leadership styles. Conversely, ethical leadership positively influences the employees’ engagement by reducing psychological distress, underscoring the benefits of ethical leadership in fostering a supportive work environment. The study's results emphasize the importance of addressing psychological distress to enhance employee engagement. The recommendations include that implementing leadership development programs and prioritizing mental health initiatives to improve employee well-being and productivity. The study contributes to literature by elucidating complex relationships amid leadership styles, psychological distress and employee engagement offering insights for the organizational effectiveness.

Gomal University Journal of ResearchVol. 40(3)
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), University of the Punjab (PK), Management Sciences (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.