Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison

Passively elevating body temperature can trigger a potentially beneficial acute inflammatory response. However, heat therapy often causes discomfort and negative thermal perceptions, particularly in females who generally have lower heat tolerance than males. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of facial cooling on thermal comfort and interleukin-6 concentration in response to 60 minutes of dry heat exposure, and to investigate sex differences in physiological responses and perceptions. 22 healthy young adults (10 females, 12 males; age: 24.4 ± 3.3 years) completed three trials in randomized order using a dry sauna device: 1) Hyperthermia (71.1 ± 1.9°C; HEAT), 2) Hyperthermia with facial cooling via fans (71.1 ± 3.0°C; FAN), and 3) Normothermia (27.0 ± 0.9°C; CON). Blood samples to determine interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration were collected before and after exposure; basic affect and thermal comfort, rectal and skin temperature were assessed throughout the intervention. Rectal temperature following HEAT (38.0 ± 0.3°C) and FAN (37.8 ± 0.3°C) did not differ between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.57). Females had higher forehead skin temperatures than males (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.019). Thermal comfort remained more positive in FAN compared to HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002). Females felt more thermal discomfort than males in HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.03), but not in FAN (<i>p</i> = 0.28). The increase in IL-6 plasma concentration was similar between HEAT and FAN (<i>p</i> = 1.00), and higher than CON (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02); there was no difference between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.69). This study showed that facial cooling alleviated the thermal discomfort during heat exposure, particularly benefitted females, and did not impede the acute IL-6 response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Temperature
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2406730
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison

Sven P. Hoekstra, Yunuo Su, Christof A. Leicht, Emma O’Donnell
4 citations
Temperature
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.31
article

Facial cooling improves thermal perceptions and maintains the interleukin-6 response during passive heating: A sex comparison

Sven P. Hoekstra, Yunuo Su, Christof A. Leicht, Emma O’Donnell
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Passively elevating body temperature can trigger a potentially beneficial acute inflammatory response. However, heat therapy often causes discomfort and negative thermal perceptions, particularly in females who generally have lower heat tolerance than males. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of facial cooling on thermal comfort and interleukin-6 concentration in response to 60 minutes of dry heat exposure, and to investigate sex differences in physiological responses and perceptions. 22 healthy young adults (10 females, 12 males; age: 24.4 ± 3.3 years) completed three trials in randomized order using a dry sauna device: 1) Hyperthermia (71.1 ± 1.9°C; HEAT), 2) Hyperthermia with facial cooling via fans (71.1 ± 3.0°C; FAN), and 3) Normothermia (27.0 ± 0.9°C; CON). Blood samples to determine interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration were collected before and after exposure; basic affect and thermal comfort, rectal and skin temperature were assessed throughout the intervention. Rectal temperature following HEAT (38.0 ± 0.3°C) and FAN (37.8 ± 0.3°C) did not differ between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.57). Females had higher forehead skin temperatures than males (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.019). Thermal comfort remained more positive in FAN compared to HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.002). Females felt more thermal discomfort than males in HEAT (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.03), but not in FAN (<i>p</i> = 0.28). The increase in IL-6 plasma concentration was similar between HEAT and FAN (<i>p</i> = 1.00), and higher than CON (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02); there was no difference between males and females (<i>p</i> = 0.69). This study showed that facial cooling alleviated the thermal discomfort during heat exposure, particularly benefitted females, and did not impede the acute IL-6 response.

TemperatureVol. 12(1)
Loughborough University (GB), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.