SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PARADIGMATIC POLARIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH IN THE 21st CENTURY

This paper critically examines the philosophical traditions in social sciences, the dialectics of paradigms, theory, and its strong links with method and the associated data collection techniques. It X-rays the polar tension between structure and agency paradigms as an explanatory framework for social analysis in the context of nomothetic and idiographic approaches to social research, considering social processes and social changes. The paper concludes that in the 20th century, the emerged social processes have deconstructed structures, thus, providing a clue for locating actors within structures in the 21st century. Actors’ interpretations, shared meanings, and lived experiences have tended to be significant in social analysis. By the same token, the structural methodology should be shored up to better provide answers to epistemological questions, given the undeniable structural context for micro-interactions and lived experiences, since structures are reified notions of representation, and this should be the intellectual pursuit of the 21st-century social scientists of the positive (structural) paradigm.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
WILBERFORCE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36108/wjss/4202.90.0270
Primary Topic
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PARADIGMATIC POLARIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH IN THE 21st CENTURY

VALENTINE OLUSHOLA OYEDIPE, CHRIS ADEDEJI IBITOYE
WILBERFORCE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
article

SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PARADIGMATIC POLARIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH IN THE 21st CENTURY

VALENTINE OLUSHOLA OYEDIPE, CHRIS ADEDEJI IBITOYE
article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the philosophical traditions in social sciences, the dialectics of paradigms, theory, and its strong links with method and the associated data collection techniques. It X-rays the polar tension between structure and agency paradigms as an explanatory framework for social analysis in the context of nomothetic and idiographic approaches to social research, considering social processes and social changes. The paper concludes that in the 20th century, the emerged social processes have deconstructed structures, thus, providing a clue for locating actors within structures in the 21st century. Actors’ interpretations, shared meanings, and lived experiences have tended to be significant in social analysis. By the same token, the structural methodology should be shored up to better provide answers to epistemological questions, given the undeniable structural context for micro-interactions and lived experiences, since structures are reified notions of representation, and this should be the intellectual pursuit of the 21st-century social scientists of the positive (structural) paradigm.

WILBERFORCE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCESVol. 9(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.