The dark side of local public sector innovation: insights from SAMPADE innovation
Purpose In recent years, public sector innovation practices have continuously penetrated central and regional governments. Observations show that many new innovation ideas are abandoned after initial implementation. Therefore, this study aims to examine the dark side of local public sector innovation through the case of the Mobile Application System of Local Tax (SAMPADE) innovation. Design/methodology/approach This study used the concept of the dark side of public sector innovation with a focus on SAMPADE innovation. Qualitative study cases were used, and empirical data were collected from semistructured interviews and observations. Secondary data were collected from published primary study sources, including peer-reviewed journals, case studies, government newsletters, online newspapers and books. Findings Referring to local findings, this study noted the weaknesses of public sector innovation caused by the failure of policymakers to consider any negative effects. Research limitations/implications This study only focuses on the dark side of one example of public service innovation. The results or other conclusions may vary depending on the unfavorable phenomena of public sector innovation. Originality/value The dark side of public sector innovation is a theme that many scholars have not analyzed. This study will contribute to the discourse, particularly in the context of local governance and developing countries.
Authors
- Ali Roziqin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-3103)
- Ach. Apriyanto Romadhan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-1842)
- Muhammad Kamil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-3115)
- Ibnu Zakaria
Institutions
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
- Published
- 2024-09-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-01-2024-0001
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Public Policy and Administration Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.71