Special Education Status and Underidentification of Twice-Exceptional Students: Insights from ECLS-K Data

The current study examined the underidentification of students with disabilities for gifted education programs, otherwise referred to as twice-exceptional students. This study utilized data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K). We estimated that approximately 17% to 18% more students with disabilities should have been identified for a gifted education program as having statistically similar achievement scores to those students without disabilities in gifted education programs. Alternatively stated, students with disabilities should make up 10.8% of gifted programs, or about 1 in 9 students in gifted programs should be twice-exceptional. Students with disabilities who were male, non-White, low-income, and indicating more internalizing problem behaviors were more likely to not be identified for a gifted education program despite having similar achievement scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101048
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Special Education Status and Underidentification of Twice-Exceptional Students: Insights from ECLS-K Data

Jennifer L. Jolly, Lucy Barnard‐Brak
4 citations
Education Sciences
Family and Disability Support Research
2.56
article

Special Education Status and Underidentification of Twice-Exceptional Students: Insights from ECLS-K Data

Jennifer L. Jolly, Lucy Barnard‐Brak
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The current study examined the underidentification of students with disabilities for gifted education programs, otherwise referred to as twice-exceptional students. This study utilized data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K). We estimated that approximately 17% to 18% more students with disabilities should have been identified for a gifted education program as having statistically similar achievement scores to those students without disabilities in gifted education programs. Alternatively stated, students with disabilities should make up 10.8% of gifted programs, or about 1 in 9 students in gifted programs should be twice-exceptional. Students with disabilities who were male, non-White, low-income, and indicating more internalizing problem behaviors were more likely to not be identified for a gifted education program despite having similar achievement scores.

Education SciencesVol. 14(10)
University of Alabama (US), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Family and Disability Support Research
2.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.