Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts

Biodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Principles of fair allocation - which are grounded in longstanding theories of justice and are mathematically operationalizable - are rarely used in biodiversity decision-making but can help to deliver procedural and distributive justice alongside biodiversity outcomes. We show how incorporating rules of fair allocation into biodiversity decision-making could advance policy formulation towards a safe and just future. Such rules provide a means to operationalize equity and create space for cooperatively and constructively negotiating avoidance liabilities within biodiversity impact mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2024.09.002
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts

Hollie Booth, Joseph W. Bull, Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, E.J. Milner‐Gulland et al.
6 citations
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Environmental Conservation and Management
4.26
article

Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts

Hollie Booth, Joseph W. Bull, Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, E.J. Milner‐Gulland, Dale Squires, Ashley Bang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Biodiversity is declining at alarming rates, with some negative impacts caused by activities that are necessary for meeting basic human needs and others which should be avoided to prevent ecological collapse. Avoidance of biodiversity impacts is costly; these costs must be distributed fairly. Principles of fair allocation - which are grounded in longstanding theories of justice and are mathematically operationalizable - are rarely used in biodiversity decision-making but can help to deliver procedural and distributive justice alongside biodiversity outcomes. We show how incorporating rules of fair allocation into biodiversity decision-making could advance policy formulation towards a safe and just future. Such rules provide a means to operationalize equity and create space for cooperatively and constructively negotiating avoidance liabilities within biodiversity impact mitigation.

Trends in Ecology & EvolutionVol. 39(12)
Mansfield University (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Oxford (GB), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Conservation and Management
4.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.