Determinants of Violence in 
India: Role of Economic and 
Ethnic Factors

The article examines what type of individuals face violence in India. We specify and estimate a probit model where the probability that a person would face violence depends on several individual, regional and institutional variables. The empirical application of this model on the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) data set for the year 2011–2012 reveals the presence of an important interaction between economic and ethnic factors. We find that violence against a ‘backward’ social group increases when it becomes upwardly mobile. In the case of forward castes, a reverse pattern is seen. Among ethnic measures, fractionalisation turned out to be the most important one in our study. Polarisation turned out to be statistically significant only when regions affected by violent separatist or political movements were treated with a dummy variable. Interestingly, as predicted by Esteban and Ray (2011) , the Gini coefficient based on consumption did not turn out to be significant. Among other variables, political activism, access to sanitation and the number of adult males in a household were important determinants of susceptibility to violence. Ongoing feuds in the village and radical or separatist movements in a state also increased susceptibility to violence. JEL Codes: Z13, Z18, D31, D74

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Indian Economic Journal
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662241265557
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of Violence in 
India: Role of Economic and 
Ethnic Factors

S. Shukla, Kaushik Bhattacharya
The Indian Economic Journal
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Determinants of Violence in 
India: Role of Economic and 
Ethnic Factors

S. Shukla, Kaushik Bhattacharya
article en

Abstract

The article examines what type of individuals face violence in India. We specify and estimate a probit model where the probability that a person would face violence depends on several individual, regional and institutional variables. The empirical application of this model on the India Human Development Survey (IHDS) data set for the year 2011–2012 reveals the presence of an important interaction between economic and ethnic factors. We find that violence against a ‘backward’ social group increases when it becomes upwardly mobile. In the case of forward castes, a reverse pattern is seen. Among ethnic measures, fractionalisation turned out to be the most important one in our study. Polarisation turned out to be statistically significant only when regions affected by violent separatist or political movements were treated with a dummy variable. Interestingly, as predicted by Esteban and Ray (2011) , the Gini coefficient based on consumption did not turn out to be significant. Among other variables, political activism, access to sanitation and the number of adult males in a household were important determinants of susceptibility to violence. Ongoing feuds in the village and radical or separatist movements in a state also increased susceptibility to violence. JEL Codes: Z13, Z18, D31, D74

The Indian Economic Journal
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.