Discussing the measurements accuracy in judicial geodetic expertise

The authors analyze the features of using the requirements for accuracy at performing forensic geodetic inspections. An analogy is drawn with the use of methods regulated in the legislation for cadastral work. The features of the Rosreestr requirements for applying them in the expertise are studied. At the same time, the provisions of the normative document regarding accuracy and the possibilities of its application are considered. It is concluded that scientific achievements in precision terms requirements for the mentioned process can outstrip the law. In addition, changing the interpretation of existing standards can make significant shifts in the current reality. It is also important that practice (experiment), as the main criterion for judgments, can provide additional conclusions which should be updated in the scientific and legal literature

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geodesy and Cartography
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1010-8-42-50
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussing the measurements accuracy in judicial geodetic expertise

Daria V. Parkhomenko, М. В. Дробиз, I.V. Saenko
1 citations
Geodesy and Cartography
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
0.27
article

Discussing the measurements accuracy in judicial geodetic expertise

Daria V. Parkhomenko, М. В. Дробиз, I.V. Saenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The authors analyze the features of using the requirements for accuracy at performing forensic geodetic inspections. An analogy is drawn with the use of methods regulated in the legislation for cadastral work. The features of the Rosreestr requirements for applying them in the expertise are studied. At the same time, the provisions of the normative document regarding accuracy and the possibilities of its application are considered. It is concluded that scientific achievements in precision terms requirements for the mentioned process can outstrip the law. In addition, changing the interpretation of existing standards can make significant shifts in the current reality. It is also important that practice (experiment), as the main criterion for judgments, can provide additional conclusions which should be updated in the scientific and legal literature

Geodesy and CartographyVol. 1010(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.