Proteomic Profiling Identifies Predictive Signatures for Progression Risk in Patients with Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma

<b>Background:</b> Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by an indolent nature and generally favorable prognosis, yet poses a particular clinical challenge, since disease progression is observed in a notable subset of patients. Currently, it is not possible to anticipate which patients will be at risk of progression, highlighting the need for reliable predictive biomarkers that can be detected early in the disease. <b>Methods:</b> We applied tandem-mass-tag labelled nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-MS/MS) on 48 diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from patients with advanced-stage FL. Of these, 17 experienced subsequent progression (subsequently-progressing, sp-FL) while 31 did not (non-progressing, np-FL). <b>Results:</b> We identified 99 proteins that were significantly differentially expressed between sp-FL samples and np-FL samples (<i>p</i> < 0.05; log<sub>2</sub>-fold changes between 0.2 and -1.3). Based on this subset of proteins, we classified patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups using unsupervised machine learning techniques. Pathway analyses of the identified proteins revealed aberrancies within the immune system and cellular energy metabolism. In addition, two proteins were selected for immunohistochemical evaluation, namely stimulator of interferon genes 1 (STING1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). Notably, IDH2 retained significantly lower expression levels in sp-FL samples compared with np-FL samples (<i>p</i> = 0.034). Low IDH2 expression correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides evidence for some of the biological mechanisms likely to be involved in FL progression and, importantly, identifies potential predictive biomarkers for improvement of risk stratification up-front at time of FL diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193278
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proteomic Profiling Identifies Predictive Signatures for Progression Risk in Patients with Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma

Emma Frasez Sørensen, Maja Ludvigsen, Robert Kridel, Kristina Lystlund Lauridsen et al.
4 citations
Cancers
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.70
article

Proteomic Profiling Identifies Predictive Signatures for Progression Risk in Patients with Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma

Emma Frasez Sørensen, Maja Ludvigsen, Robert Kridel, Kristina Lystlund Lauridsen, Marie Beck Enemark, Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit, Bent Honoré, Jonas Klejs Hemmingsen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by an indolent nature and generally favorable prognosis, yet poses a particular clinical challenge, since disease progression is observed in a notable subset of patients. Currently, it is not possible to anticipate which patients will be at risk of progression, highlighting the need for reliable predictive biomarkers that can be detected early in the disease. <b>Methods:</b> We applied tandem-mass-tag labelled nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-MS/MS) on 48 diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from patients with advanced-stage FL. Of these, 17 experienced subsequent progression (subsequently-progressing, sp-FL) while 31 did not (non-progressing, np-FL). <b>Results:</b> We identified 99 proteins that were significantly differentially expressed between sp-FL samples and np-FL samples (<i>p</i> < 0.05; log<sub>2</sub>-fold changes between 0.2 and -1.3). Based on this subset of proteins, we classified patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups using unsupervised machine learning techniques. Pathway analyses of the identified proteins revealed aberrancies within the immune system and cellular energy metabolism. In addition, two proteins were selected for immunohistochemical evaluation, namely stimulator of interferon genes 1 (STING1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). Notably, IDH2 retained significantly lower expression levels in sp-FL samples compared with np-FL samples (<i>p</i> = 0.034). Low IDH2 expression correlated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides evidence for some of the biological mechanisms likely to be involved in FL progression and, importantly, identifies potential predictive biomarkers for improvement of risk stratification up-front at time of FL diagnosis.

CancersVol. 16(19)
University Health Network (CA), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
Aarhus Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.