Are automated video interviews smart enough? Behavioral modes, reliability, validity, and bias of machine learning cognitive ability assessments.

Authors

Louis Tay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-4728)
Sang Eun Woo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-5913)
Louis Hickman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-7705)

Institutions

Virginia Tech (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Journal of Applied Psychology
Published: 2024-09-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001236
Citations: 8
Primary Topic: Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 4.06

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Are automated video interviews smart enough? Behavioral modes, reliability, validity, and bias of machine learning cognitive ability assessments.

Louis Tay, Sang Eun Woo, Louis Hickman

Sep 26, 2024

8 citations

Journal of Applied Psychology

Cognitive Abilities and Testing

4.06

article

Are automated video interviews smart enough? Behavioral modes, reliability, validity, and bias of machine learning cognitive ability assessments.

Louis Tay, Sang Eun Woo, Louis Hickman

September 26, 2024article en

8 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Journal of Applied PsychologyVol. 110(3)

Virginia Tech (US)

Quality Education

Openalex Percentile: Top 6%

Cognitive Abilities and Testing

4.06

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.