Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Typical household recyclable bin in Australia contains around 60% of waste cardboard. Given the possibilities of developing a construction material, this study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing the development of cardboard trusses with © timber trusses, encompassing production to construction. The results show that cardboard trusses offer significant environmental benefits, including a 73% reduction in climate change category, an 83% decrease in ozone-depleting potential, and almost complete avoidance of agricultural land occupation compared to timber trusses, showcasing their sustainability. In both material manufacturing and material transportation, cardboard trusses prioritize climate change mitigation, accounting for over half of the environmental impact. Timber trusses, in contrast, heavily impact land occupation and exhibit climate change dominance. A benefit analysis highlights advantages of cardboard trusses, particularly in reducing land occupation, sustainability, circular economy, and particulate matter formation. The life cycle cost analysis demonstrates an impressive 83% cost reduction for cardboard trusses compared to timber trusses, despite higher labor costs during manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198386
Citations
3
Primary Topic
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment

David William Law, Srikanth Venkatesan, Satheeskumar Navaratnam, Rebecca J. Gravina et al.
3 citations
Sustainability
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
0.80
article

Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment

David William Law, Srikanth Venkatesan, Satheeskumar Navaratnam, Rebecca J. Gravina, Jingxuan Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Typical household recyclable bin in Australia contains around 60% of waste cardboard. Given the possibilities of developing a construction material, this study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing the development of cardboard trusses with © timber trusses, encompassing production to construction. The results show that cardboard trusses offer significant environmental benefits, including a 73% reduction in climate change category, an 83% decrease in ozone-depleting potential, and almost complete avoidance of agricultural land occupation compared to timber trusses, showcasing their sustainability. In both material manufacturing and material transportation, cardboard trusses prioritize climate change mitigation, accounting for over half of the environmental impact. Timber trusses, in contrast, heavily impact land occupation and exhibit climate change dominance. A benefit analysis highlights advantages of cardboard trusses, particularly in reducing land occupation, sustainability, circular economy, and particulate matter formation. The life cycle cost analysis demonstrates an impressive 83% cost reduction for cardboard trusses compared to timber trusses, despite higher labor costs during manufacturing.

SustainabilityVol. 16(19)
The University of Queensland (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Sustainability Victoria
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Application of Recycled Cardboard to Construction Based on Life Cycle Assessment — David William Law, Srikanth Venkatesan, et al. · Sustainability (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS