Comparative Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Filled Embankment and Excavated Graben Schemes of Railway Subgrade Engineering

To quantitatively compare the carbon emissions between the filled embankment scheme and the excavated graben scheme of railway subgrade engineering, first, according to the life cycle assessment theory, the two schemes were separated into four stages: building materials production, building materials transportation, construction, and operation and maintenance. The carbon emission factor method was then used to compute the carbon emissions of the filled embankment scheme and the excavated graben scheme. The results indicate that the carbon emissions of the filled embankment scheme are 8783.76 t, 801.71 t, 627.78 t, and 1021.33 t at each stage, and 11,234.58 t over its total life cycle. The carbon emissions at each stage of the excavated graben scheme are 954.96 t, 52.62 t, 772.69 t, and 178.03 t, respectively, and 1958.30 t over its total life cycle. Finally, the carbon abatement potential of the excavated graben scheme with less carbon emissions was investigated by changing the soil nail wall slope to an ecological slope. The results show that after changing the soil nail wall slope of the excavated graben scheme to an ecological slope, the excavated graben scheme’s carbon sequestration of the total life cycle is 3274.38 t.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198384
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Filled Embankment and Excavated Graben Schemes of Railway Subgrade Engineering

Xiangru Lv, Xueying Bao, Zilong Li, Zhongshuai Shen
3 citations
Sustainability
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.09
article

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Filled Embankment and Excavated Graben Schemes of Railway Subgrade Engineering

Xiangru Lv, Xueying Bao, Zilong Li, Zhongshuai Shen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To quantitatively compare the carbon emissions between the filled embankment scheme and the excavated graben scheme of railway subgrade engineering, first, according to the life cycle assessment theory, the two schemes were separated into four stages: building materials production, building materials transportation, construction, and operation and maintenance. The carbon emission factor method was then used to compute the carbon emissions of the filled embankment scheme and the excavated graben scheme. The results indicate that the carbon emissions of the filled embankment scheme are 8783.76 t, 801.71 t, 627.78 t, and 1021.33 t at each stage, and 11,234.58 t over its total life cycle. The carbon emissions at each stage of the excavated graben scheme are 954.96 t, 52.62 t, 772.69 t, and 178.03 t, respectively, and 1958.30 t over its total life cycle. Finally, the carbon abatement potential of the excavated graben scheme with less carbon emissions was investigated by changing the soil nail wall slope to an ecological slope. The results show that after changing the soil nail wall slope of the excavated graben scheme to an ecological slope, the excavated graben scheme’s carbon sequestration of the total life cycle is 3274.38 t.

SustainabilityVol. 16(19)
Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN), China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.