Nuclear safeguards during crises: three scenarios of restricted access to nuclear interim storage facilities

Abstract Safeguards by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) play a pivotal role in preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Over the years, the IAEA’s safeguards system has adapted to technological advancements and changing political landscapes, making it more resilient and flexible. This adaption is not only the result of programmes aiming at preparing and foreseeing future challenges in the nuclear field but also the result of several crises that have occurred over the last decades, including attempts to break non-proliferation commitments and limited access to facilities. The aim of this article is to explore what could be done in an event of unavoidable crises, with a focus on interim nuclear storage facilities where the continuity of knowledge is broken, and a quick and relatively reliable response is needed. We conducted a scenario-based workshop with multidisciplinary experts with different backgrounds working in the area of peace and conflict research. The workshop simulated three scenarios: (1) a terrorist occupation, (2) a flood, and (3) a mismatch of information following a coup d’état. This workshop revealed insights into crisis management strategies, data sampling, and the relevance of formal and informal interpersonal networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-024-00126-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nuclear safeguards during crises: three scenarios of restricted access to nuclear interim storage facilities

Linda Ostermann, Irmgard Niemeyer, Malte Göttsche, Julian Schäfer et al.
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
0.36
article

Nuclear safeguards during crises: three scenarios of restricted access to nuclear interim storage facilities

Linda Ostermann, Irmgard Niemeyer, Malte Göttsche, Julian Schäfer, René Geiser, Andreas Dürholt, Leonardo Bandarra, Sophie Kretzschmar, Lukas Rademacher, Stefan Böschen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Safeguards by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) play a pivotal role in preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Over the years, the IAEA’s safeguards system has adapted to technological advancements and changing political landscapes, making it more resilient and flexible. This adaption is not only the result of programmes aiming at preparing and foreseeing future challenges in the nuclear field but also the result of several crises that have occurred over the last decades, including attempts to break non-proliferation commitments and limited access to facilities. The aim of this article is to explore what could be done in an event of unavoidable crises, with a focus on interim nuclear storage facilities where the continuity of knowledge is broken, and a quick and relatively reliable response is needed. We conducted a scenario-based workshop with multidisciplinary experts with different backgrounds working in the area of peace and conflict research. The workshop simulated three scenarios: (1) a terrorist occupation, (2) a flood, and (3) a mismatch of information following a coup d’état. This workshop revealed insights into crisis management strategies, data sampling, and the relevance of formal and informal interpersonal networks.

Zeitschrift für Friedens- und KonfliktforschungVol. 13(2)
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.