The Safety Risks of AI-Driven Solutions in Autonomous Road Vehicles

At present Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have a dominant role in the AI-driven Autonomous driving approaches. This paper focuses on the potential safety risks of deploying DNN classifiers in Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) systems. In our experience, many theoretically sound AI-driven solutions tested and deployed in ADAS have shown serious safety flaws in practice. A brief review of practice and theory of automotive safety standards and related body of knowledge is presented. It is followed by a comparative analysis between DNN classifiers and safety standards developed in the automotive industry. The output of the study provides advice and recommendations for filling the current gaps within the complex and interrelated factors pertaining to the safety of Autonomous Road Vehicles (ARV). This study may assist ARV’s safety, system, and technology providers during the design, development, and implementation life cycle. The contribution of this work is to highlight and link the learning rules enforced by risk factors when DNN classifiers are expected to provide a near real-time safer Vehicle Navigation Solution (VNS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15100438
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Safety Risks of AI-Driven Solutions in Autonomous Road Vehicles

Alireza Mousavi, Sebelan Danishvar, Farshad Mirzarazi
18 citations
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
3.66
article

The Safety Risks of AI-Driven Solutions in Autonomous Road Vehicles

Alireza Mousavi, Sebelan Danishvar, Farshad Mirzarazi
article en
18 citations

Abstract

At present Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have a dominant role in the AI-driven Autonomous driving approaches. This paper focuses on the potential safety risks of deploying DNN classifiers in Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) systems. In our experience, many theoretically sound AI-driven solutions tested and deployed in ADAS have shown serious safety flaws in practice. A brief review of practice and theory of automotive safety standards and related body of knowledge is presented. It is followed by a comparative analysis between DNN classifiers and safety standards developed in the automotive industry. The output of the study provides advice and recommendations for filling the current gaps within the complex and interrelated factors pertaining to the safety of Autonomous Road Vehicles (ARV). This study may assist ARV’s safety, system, and technology providers during the design, development, and implementation life cycle. The contribution of this work is to highlight and link the learning rules enforced by risk factors when DNN classifiers are expected to provide a near real-time safer Vehicle Navigation Solution (VNS).

World Electric Vehicle JournalVol. 15(10)
Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.