Neuronal Mechanisms of Reading Informational Texts in People with Different Levels of Mental Resilience

The aim of this study was to verify whether the level of mental resilience would differentiate reading comprehension performance when using different information carriers. More than 150 people filled out a test regarding the level of resilience. They then participated in a survey using fNIRS. Their task was to read a one-page informational text and answer several questions. The results showed no differences in correct answers between groups of people with different levels of resilience. In the groups of people with high and low levels of resilience, the number of correct answers was not differentiated by the type of carrier. Among those with moderate levels of resilience, better results were obtained by those who read text printed on paper. Analyses of neuronal mechanisms showed that the type of carrier differentiated brain activity in each group. Obtaining the same number of correct answers in the test was the result of different neuronal mechanisms activated in those who used a computer and those who read a printed text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14090944
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuronal Mechanisms of Reading Informational Texts in People with Different Levels of Mental Resilience

Małgorzata Chojak, Anna Stachyra-Sokulska, Andrzej Różański, Ewa Sarzyńska-Mazurek et al.
Brain Sciences
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Neuronal Mechanisms of Reading Informational Texts in People with Different Levels of Mental Resilience

Małgorzata Chojak, Anna Stachyra-Sokulska, Andrzej Różański, Ewa Sarzyńska-Mazurek, Marta Czechowska‐Bieluga, Anna Gawron
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify whether the level of mental resilience would differentiate reading comprehension performance when using different information carriers. More than 150 people filled out a test regarding the level of resilience. They then participated in a survey using fNIRS. Their task was to read a one-page informational text and answer several questions. The results showed no differences in correct answers between groups of people with different levels of resilience. In the groups of people with high and low levels of resilience, the number of correct answers was not differentiated by the type of carrier. Among those with moderate levels of resilience, better results were obtained by those who read text printed on paper. Analyses of neuronal mechanisms showed that the type of carrier differentiated brain activity in each group. Obtaining the same number of correct answers in the test was the result of different neuronal mechanisms activated in those who used a computer and those who read a printed text.

Brain SciencesVol. 14(9)
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.