Discurso embaçado: a temática ambiental segundo a Brasil Paralelo

This article aims to verify the strategies used in the documentary ‘Smokescreen’, released by the production company Brasil Paralelo (2020). We sought to identify which aspects are mobilized in this type of production, with characteristics of traditional journalism. The theoretical matrix used comes from Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), who defend the authority argument as a strategy for supporting arguments in discourse. In the film analyzed, we observed that professional and academic credentials, in addition to the origin of the sources, are the resources of greatest value in this activation. The use of the authority argument gives legitimacy to revisionist versions of the climate crisis, indigenous causes and political problems in Brazil. The video incisively defends agribusiness as a synonym for economic progress and denounces vested interests in the work of NGOs dedicated to the environment, exposing a disconnected order of scattered and superficial facts when dealing with the whole.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Mídia e Cotidiano
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22409/rmc.v18i3.63492
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discurso embaçado: a temática ambiental segundo a Brasil Paralelo

Isaltina Maria de Azevedo Mello Gomes, N. L. S. Lima, Danielly Bezerra dos Santos
Revista Mídia e Cotidiano
Environmental Sustainability and Education
article

Discurso embaçado: a temática ambiental segundo a Brasil Paralelo

Isaltina Maria de Azevedo Mello Gomes, N. L. S. Lima, Danielly Bezerra dos Santos
article en

Abstract

This article aims to verify the strategies used in the documentary ‘Smokescreen’, released by the production company Brasil Paralelo (2020). We sought to identify which aspects are mobilized in this type of production, with characteristics of traditional journalism. The theoretical matrix used comes from Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (2005), who defend the authority argument as a strategy for supporting arguments in discourse. In the film analyzed, we observed that professional and academic credentials, in addition to the origin of the sources, are the resources of greatest value in this activation. The use of the authority argument gives legitimacy to revisionist versions of the climate crisis, indigenous causes and political problems in Brazil. The video incisively defends agribusiness as a synonym for economic progress and denounces vested interests in the work of NGOs dedicated to the environment, exposing a disconnected order of scattered and superficial facts when dealing with the whole.

Revista Mídia e CotidianoVol. 18(3)
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Environmental Sustainability and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discurso embaçado: a temática ambiental segundo a Brasil Paralelo — Isaltina Maria de Azevedo Mello Gomes, N. L. S. Lima, et al. · Revista Mídia e Cotidiano (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS