Multidisciplinary management of adult patients with chylothorax: a consensus statement

The management of chylothorax remains challenging given the limited evidence and significant heterogeneity in practice. In addition, there are no practical guidelines on the optimal approach to manage this complex condition. We convened an international group of 27 experts from 20 institutions across five countries and four specialties (pulmonary, interventional radiology, thoracic surgery and nutrition) with experience and expertise in managing adult patients with chylothorax. We performed a literature and internet search for reports addressing seven clinically relevant PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) questions pertaining to the management of adult patients with chylothorax. This consensus statement, consisting of best practice statements based on expert consensus addressing these seven PICO questions, was formulated by a systematic and rigorous process involving the evaluation of published evidence, augmented with provider experience. Panel members participated in the development of the final best practice statements using the modified Delphi technique. Our consensus statement aims to offer guidance in clinical decision making when managing patients with chylothorax while also identifying gaps in knowledge and informing future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00470-2024
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidisciplinary management of adult patients with chylothorax: a consensus statement

Erin A. Gillaspie, Malcolm M. DeCamp, Ajinkya Desai, Mark K. Ferguson et al.
4 citations
European Respiratory Journal
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
2.29
article

Multidisciplinary management of adult patients with chylothorax: a consensus statement

Erin A. Gillaspie, Malcolm M. DeCamp, Ajinkya Desai, Mark K. Ferguson, Yaron Gesthalter, Uzair Ghori, Ravindra M. Mehta, Moïshe Liberman, Janani Reisenauer, Abhinav Agrawal, Fabien Maldonado, V. Bishay, Udit Chaddha, Andrew Kaufman, Heather Davis, Najib Mahboob Rahman, Samira Shojaee, Eihab O. Bedawi, Kush Desai, G. Nadolski, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick, David Feller‐Kopman, Horiana B. Grosu, K. Kolli, Robert J. Lentz, Gary Lee, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Brian Currie
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The management of chylothorax remains challenging given the limited evidence and significant heterogeneity in practice. In addition, there are no practical guidelines on the optimal approach to manage this complex condition. We convened an international group of 27 experts from 20 institutions across five countries and four specialties (pulmonary, interventional radiology, thoracic surgery and nutrition) with experience and expertise in managing adult patients with chylothorax. We performed a literature and internet search for reports addressing seven clinically relevant PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) questions pertaining to the management of adult patients with chylothorax. This consensus statement, consisting of best practice statements based on expert consensus addressing these seven PICO questions, was formulated by a systematic and rigorous process involving the evaluation of published evidence, augmented with provider experience. Panel members participated in the development of the final best practice statements using the modified Delphi technique. Our consensus statement aims to offer guidance in clinical decision making when managing patients with chylothorax while also identifying gaps in knowledge and informing future research.

European Respiratory JournalVol. 64(5)
Dartmouth College (US), Northwestern University (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Northwell Health (US), University Health Network (CA), Apollo Hospitals (IN), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Washington (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Cornell University (US), CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), University of California System (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Oxford (GB), University of Chicago (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), China First Heavy Industries (China) (CN), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Apollo Hospitals (IN), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Université de Montréal (CA), University of San Francisco (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Philadelphia University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.