The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

<b>Background</b>: The QLV ratio (QLV/baseline QRS width) is an established intraoperative-measurable parameter during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, potentially predicting the efficacy of electrical resynchronization. <b>Methods</b>: Left bundle branch area pacing-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) is a novel approach with the potential to improve both responder rate and responder level in the CRT candidate patient group, even when an optimal electro-anatomical left ventricular lead position is not achievable. In our observational study, 72 CRT-defibrillator candidate patients with a QRS duration of 160 ± 12 ms were consecutively implanted. Using a QLV-ratio-based implant strategy, 40 patients received a biventricular CRT device (Biv-CRT) with an optimal QLV ratio (≥70%). Twenty-eight patients with a suboptimal QLV ratio (<70%) were upgraded intraoperatively to a LOT-CRT system. Patients were followed for 12 months. <b>Results</b>: The postoperative results showed a significantly greater reduction in QRS width in the LOT-CRT patient group compared to the Biv-CRT patients (40.4 ± 14 ms vs. 32 ± 13 ms; <i>p</i> = 0.024). At 12 months, the LOT-CRT group also demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9 ± 8% vs. 10.3 ± 7.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4; <i>p</i> = 0.031), and a significant decrease in NT-pro-BNP levels (1863± 380 pg/mL vs. 1238 ± 412 pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.012). Notably, the LOT-CRT patients showed results comparable to Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio (>80%) in terms of QRS width reduction and LVEF improvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our single-center study demonstrated the feasibility of a QLV-ratio-based implantation strategy during CRT implantation. Patients with a LOT-CRT system showed significant improvements, whereas Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio may not be expected to benefit from an additional LOT-CRT upgrade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195742
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

István Szokodi, Tamás Bisztray, Attila Kónyi, P Ezer et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
1.21
article

The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

István Szokodi, Tamás Bisztray, Attila Kónyi, P Ezer, András Komócsi, Gábor Vilmányi, Réka Lukács, Kitti Szűcs
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The QLV ratio (QLV/baseline QRS width) is an established intraoperative-measurable parameter during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, potentially predicting the efficacy of electrical resynchronization. <b>Methods</b>: Left bundle branch area pacing-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) is a novel approach with the potential to improve both responder rate and responder level in the CRT candidate patient group, even when an optimal electro-anatomical left ventricular lead position is not achievable. In our observational study, 72 CRT-defibrillator candidate patients with a QRS duration of 160 ± 12 ms were consecutively implanted. Using a QLV-ratio-based implant strategy, 40 patients received a biventricular CRT device (Biv-CRT) with an optimal QLV ratio (≥70%). Twenty-eight patients with a suboptimal QLV ratio (<70%) were upgraded intraoperatively to a LOT-CRT system. Patients were followed for 12 months. <b>Results</b>: The postoperative results showed a significantly greater reduction in QRS width in the LOT-CRT patient group compared to the Biv-CRT patients (40.4 ± 14 ms vs. 32 ± 13 ms; <i>p</i> = 0.024). At 12 months, the LOT-CRT group also demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9 ± 8% vs. 10.3 ± 7.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4; <i>p</i> = 0.031), and a significant decrease in NT-pro-BNP levels (1863± 380 pg/mL vs. 1238 ± 412 pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.012). Notably, the LOT-CRT patients showed results comparable to Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio (>80%) in terms of QRS width reduction and LVEF improvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our single-center study demonstrated the feasibility of a QLV-ratio-based implantation strategy during CRT implantation. Patients with a LOT-CRT system showed significant improvements, whereas Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio may not be expected to benefit from an additional LOT-CRT upgrade.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(19)
University of Oslo (NO), University of Pecs (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.