Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis

Cats with diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis DK(A) require intensive glucose monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between a portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) and a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2.0 Abbott<sup>®</sup>) measuring interstitial glucose in cats with DK(A). Ten client-owned cats with naturally occurring DK(A) were prospectively enrolled. Glucose concentrations were assessed with both methods every 1-3 h until resolution of DK(A), and every 4-8 h thereafter. While the median FGMS measured glucose concentration (14.3 mmol/L) was significantly lower than the median PBGM measured glucose concentration (19 mmol/L) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the overall correlation between the FGMS and PBGM was high (r = 0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the Parkes error grid analysis, 98.3% of measurements fell in zones A and B. Bland-Altman plot analysis demonstrated that in the low glycaemic range (BG < 5.5 mmol/L), 50% of FGMS measurements deviated more than ±0.83 mmol/L, and in the high glycaemic range (BG > 5.5 mmol/L), 81% of results deviated >15% from the PBGM measurements. There was significant inter-individual variation in the difference between glucose concentrations measured by the FGMS and PBGM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In spite of being more easily tolerated and easier to use, currently this method cannot be recommended for routine monitoring of cats with DK(A).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192787
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis

Beatriz Vidondo, Simone Schüller, Katarina Hazuchova, Miguel Campos et al.
2 citations
Animals
Diabetes and associated disorders
1.10
article

Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis

Beatriz Vidondo, Simone Schüller, Katarina Hazuchova, Miguel Campos, Yi Ping Cui, Jennifer S. Eiermann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cats with diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis DK(A) require intensive glucose monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between a portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) and a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2.0 Abbott<sup>®</sup>) measuring interstitial glucose in cats with DK(A). Ten client-owned cats with naturally occurring DK(A) were prospectively enrolled. Glucose concentrations were assessed with both methods every 1-3 h until resolution of DK(A), and every 4-8 h thereafter. While the median FGMS measured glucose concentration (14.3 mmol/L) was significantly lower than the median PBGM measured glucose concentration (19 mmol/L) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the overall correlation between the FGMS and PBGM was high (r = 0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the Parkes error grid analysis, 98.3% of measurements fell in zones A and B. Bland-Altman plot analysis demonstrated that in the low glycaemic range (BG < 5.5 mmol/L), 50% of FGMS measurements deviated more than ±0.83 mmol/L, and in the high glycaemic range (BG > 5.5 mmol/L), 81% of results deviated >15% from the PBGM measurements. There was significant inter-individual variation in the difference between glucose concentrations measured by the FGMS and PBGM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In spite of being more easily tolerated and easier to use, currently this method cannot be recommended for routine monitoring of cats with DK(A).

AnimalsVol. 14(19)
University of Bern (CH), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Diabetes and associated disorders
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.