A non‐approximate method for generating G$G$‐optimal RSM designs

Abstract We present a nonapproximate computational method for generating ‐optimal designs in response surface methodology (RSM) settings using Gloptipoly , a global polynomial optimizer. Traditional approaches use a grid approximation for computing a candidate design's ‐score. Gloptipoly can find the global optimum of high‐order polynomials thus making it suitable for computing a design's ‐score, that is, its maximum scaled prediction variance, which, for second‐order models, is a quartic polynomial function of the experimental factors. We demonstrate the efficacy and performance of our method through comprehensive application to well‐published examples, and illustrate, for the first time, its application to generating ‐optimal designs supporting models of order greater than 2. This work represents the first non‐approximate computational approach to solving the ‐optimal design problem. This advancement opens new possibilities for finding ‐optimal designs beyond second‐order RSM models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3660
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A non‐approximate method for generating G$G$‐optimal RSM designs

Stephen J. Walsh, Rong Pan, Hyrum J. Hansen
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

A non‐approximate method for generating G$G$‐optimal RSM designs

Stephen J. Walsh, Rong Pan, Hyrum J. Hansen
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present a nonapproximate computational method for generating ‐optimal designs in response surface methodology (RSM) settings using Gloptipoly , a global polynomial optimizer. Traditional approaches use a grid approximation for computing a candidate design's ‐score. Gloptipoly can find the global optimum of high‐order polynomials thus making it suitable for computing a design's ‐score, that is, its maximum scaled prediction variance, which, for second‐order models, is a quartic polynomial function of the experimental factors. We demonstrate the efficacy and performance of our method through comprehensive application to well‐published examples, and illustrate, for the first time, its application to generating ‐optimal designs supporting models of order greater than 2. This work represents the first non‐approximate computational approach to solving the ‐optimal design problem. This advancement opens new possibilities for finding ‐optimal designs beyond second‐order RSM models.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(1)
Utah State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.