Long-Term Three-Dimensional Morphometric Outcome Study of Nasal Bone in Cleft Patients

Cleft lip nose deformities are characterized by underlying features in the bony skeleton as well as the soft tissues; however, no previous study has focused on the evaluation of the nasal bone. The aim of this study was to compare nasal bone features among adult patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate, those with bilateral cleft lip and palate, and controls. Included in this retrospective study were patients aged ≥16 years with nonsyndromic cleft who underwent long-term orthodontic treatment and controls aged 18-45 years who underwent surgery for jaw deformities at Keio University Hospital. Piriform width, nasal width, and nasomaxillary angle values measured on CT were compared among the groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Nine patients had unilateral cleft lip and alveolar cleft, 19 had unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate, and 14 had bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLCP). There were 18 controls. Mean piriform width and mean nasomaxillary angle were significantly greater in the BCLCP group than the control group (20.1±2.54 mm versus 18.8±1.35 mm, P <0.05; and 105.8±8.13 degrees versus 100.4±7.95 degrees, P <0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference in mean nasal width among the groups. Nasal bone morphology was not affected by initial cleft lip alone or by the presence or absence of cleft palate. Patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate have a wider and lower nose than those without cleft deformity and might benefit more from reduction of the bony nasal width than from treatment of the soft tissues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010684
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Three-Dimensional Morphometric Outcome Study of Nasal Bone in Cleft Patients

Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Kei Enomoto, Junpei Miyamoto
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Long-Term Three-Dimensional Morphometric Outcome Study of Nasal Bone in Cleft Patients

Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Kei Enomoto, Junpei Miyamoto
article en

Abstract

Cleft lip nose deformities are characterized by underlying features in the bony skeleton as well as the soft tissues; however, no previous study has focused on the evaluation of the nasal bone. The aim of this study was to compare nasal bone features among adult patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate, those with bilateral cleft lip and palate, and controls. Included in this retrospective study were patients aged ≥16 years with nonsyndromic cleft who underwent long-term orthodontic treatment and controls aged 18-45 years who underwent surgery for jaw deformities at Keio University Hospital. Piriform width, nasal width, and nasomaxillary angle values measured on CT were compared among the groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Nine patients had unilateral cleft lip and alveolar cleft, 19 had unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate, and 14 had bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLCP). There were 18 controls. Mean piriform width and mean nasomaxillary angle were significantly greater in the BCLCP group than the control group (20.1±2.54 mm versus 18.8±1.35 mm, P <0.05; and 105.8±8.13 degrees versus 100.4±7.95 degrees, P <0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference in mean nasal width among the groups. Nasal bone morphology was not affected by initial cleft lip alone or by the presence or absence of cleft palate. Patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate have a wider and lower nose than those without cleft deformity and might benefit more from reduction of the bony nasal width than from treatment of the soft tissues.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(3)
Keio University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.