Dispersal direction, geographic location and river discharge all influence juvenile growth of a freshwater fish

Abstract Seeking out appropriate habitat or food resources is one of the key reasons why animals move. Despite the benefits of movement, some individuals in a population remain resident or express alternative movement phenotypes. Movement, however, is energetically costly and can result in resources being diverted away from growth and reproduction. The presence of multiple movement phenotypes within populations suggests that each can have commensurate levels of performance depending on the underlying environmental conditions. Here we explore the context‐dependent costs and benefits of upstream and downstream juvenile dispersal in a large river system. We expect that if the energetic costs of moving (upstream against a current or downstream with a current) exceed any benefits to growth, then residents (who do not move) will have faster growth. Alternatively, movement costs may be offset if individuals move to more favourable environments, resulting in dispersers benefiting with faster growth. We used biological information naturally archived in the otoliths of a potamodromous fish, golden perch Macquaria ambigua , to quantify how movement phenotypes affect growth across individuals exposed to spatiotemporally varying environmental conditions. We found that juvenile growth differed considerably among dispersal phenotypes (resident, upstream, downstream, stocked): in general, surviving wild‐spawned downstream and upstream dispersers and hatchery‐stocked fish all grew faster than individuals that remained resident within their natal reach. Further, juvenile growth was sensitive to local environmental conditions and had carryover effects from an individual's natal‐year. Juvenile growth of all dispersal phenotypes was higher in years with below average natal‐year summer discharge (when fish are ~2–3 months old), likely because of increased concentrations of food resources. In contrast, the effects of natal‐year spring discharge (around the time individuals were spawned) were dependent on dispersal direction, with positive effects for downstream dispersers and upstream dispersers, and negative effects for resident individuals. Our results suggest that an individual's growth can benefit from early‐life movement, although the magnitude of this effect depends on local environmental conditions and the direction travelled. Our study reinforces the importance of heterogeneous and connected riverscapes that foster a diversity of individual growth responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Biology
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14338
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dispersal direction, geographic location and river discharge all influence juvenile growth of a freshwater fish

Steven Brooks, Jason D. Thiem, Ryan Woods, Jian D. L. Yen et al.
2 citations
Freshwater Biology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
1.38
article

Dispersal direction, geographic location and river discharge all influence juvenile growth of a freshwater fish

Steven Brooks, Jason D. Thiem, Ryan Woods, Jian D. L. Yen, Benjamin G. Fanson, Gavin L. Butler, Wayne M. Koster, Zeb Tonkin, John R. Morrongiello, Joshua S. Barrow, Arron Strawbridge, John D. Koehn, Brenton P. Zampatti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Seeking out appropriate habitat or food resources is one of the key reasons why animals move. Despite the benefits of movement, some individuals in a population remain resident or express alternative movement phenotypes. Movement, however, is energetically costly and can result in resources being diverted away from growth and reproduction. The presence of multiple movement phenotypes within populations suggests that each can have commensurate levels of performance depending on the underlying environmental conditions. Here we explore the context‐dependent costs and benefits of upstream and downstream juvenile dispersal in a large river system. We expect that if the energetic costs of moving (upstream against a current or downstream with a current) exceed any benefits to growth, then residents (who do not move) will have faster growth. Alternatively, movement costs may be offset if individuals move to more favourable environments, resulting in dispersers benefiting with faster growth. We used biological information naturally archived in the otoliths of a potamodromous fish, golden perch Macquaria ambigua , to quantify how movement phenotypes affect growth across individuals exposed to spatiotemporally varying environmental conditions. We found that juvenile growth differed considerably among dispersal phenotypes (resident, upstream, downstream, stocked): in general, surviving wild‐spawned downstream and upstream dispersers and hatchery‐stocked fish all grew faster than individuals that remained resident within their natal reach. Further, juvenile growth was sensitive to local environmental conditions and had carryover effects from an individual's natal‐year. Juvenile growth of all dispersal phenotypes was higher in years with below average natal‐year summer discharge (when fish are ~2–3 months old), likely because of increased concentrations of food resources. In contrast, the effects of natal‐year spring discharge (around the time individuals were spawned) were dependent on dispersal direction, with positive effects for downstream dispersers and upstream dispersers, and negative effects for resident individuals. Our results suggest that an individual's growth can benefit from early‐life movement, although the magnitude of this effect depends on local environmental conditions and the direction travelled. Our study reinforces the importance of heterogeneous and connected riverscapes that foster a diversity of individual growth responses.

Freshwater BiologyVol. 69(11)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.