Benchmarking the spectroscopic masses of 249 evolved stars using asteroseismology with <i>TESS</i>

ABSTRACT One way to understand planet formation is through studying the correlations between planet occurrence rates and stellar mass. However, measuring stellar mass in the red giant regime is very difficult. In particular, the spectroscopic masses of certain evolved stars, often referred to as ‘retired A-stars’, have been questioned in the literature. Efforts to resolve this mass controversy using spectroscopy, interferometry, and asteroseismology have so far been inconclusive. A recent ensemble study found a mass-dependent mass offset, but the result was based on only 16 stars. With NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet SurveySatellite (TESS), we expand the investigation of the mass discrepancy to a total of 92 low-luminosity stars, synonymous with the retired A-stars. We measure their characteristic oscillation frequency, $\mathrm{\nu }_{\mathrm{max}}$, and the large frequency separation, $\mathrm{\Delta \nu }$, from their TESS photometric time series. Using these measurements and asteroseismic scaling relations, we derive asteroseismic masses and compare them with spectroscopic masses from five surveys, to comprehensively study the alleged mass-dependent mass offset. We find a mass offset between spectroscopy and seismology that increases with stellar mass. However, we note that adopting the seismic mass scale does not have a significant effect on the planet occurrence-mass-metallicity correlation for the so-called retired A-stars. We also report seismic measurements and masses for 157 higher luminosity giants (mostly helium-core-burning) from the spectroscopic surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2179
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking the spectroscopic masses of 249 evolved stars using asteroseismology with TESS

Dennis Stello, Daniel Huber, Daniel Hey, Claudia Reyes et al.
3 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
article

Benchmarking the spectroscopic masses of 249 evolved stars using asteroseismology with TESS

Dennis Stello, Daniel Huber, Daniel Hey, Claudia Reyes, Sai Prathyusha Malla, T. R. Bedding, Marc Hon, Benjamin T. Montet
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT One way to understand planet formation is through studying the correlations between planet occurrence rates and stellar mass. However, measuring stellar mass in the red giant regime is very difficult. In particular, the spectroscopic masses of certain evolved stars, often referred to as ‘retired A-stars’, have been questioned in the literature. Efforts to resolve this mass controversy using spectroscopy, interferometry, and asteroseismology have so far been inconclusive. A recent ensemble study found a mass-dependent mass offset, but the result was based on only 16 stars. With NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet SurveySatellite (TESS), we expand the investigation of the mass discrepancy to a total of 92 low-luminosity stars, synonymous with the retired A-stars. We measure their characteristic oscillation frequency, $\mathrm{\nu }_{\mathrm{max}}$, and the large frequency separation, $\mathrm{\Delta \nu }$, from their TESS photometric time series. Using these measurements and asteroseismic scaling relations, we derive asteroseismic masses and compare them with spectroscopic masses from five surveys, to comprehensively study the alleged mass-dependent mass offset. We find a mass offset between spectroscopy and seismology that increases with stellar mass. However, we note that adopting the seismic mass scale does not have a significant effect on the planet occurrence-mass-metallicity correlation for the so-called retired A-stars. We also report seismic measurements and masses for 157 higher luminosity giants (mostly helium-core-burning) from the spectroscopic surveys.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 534(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Hawaii System (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.